Independent Risk Factors of Failed Extubation among Adult Critically Ill Patients: A Prospective Observational Study from Saudi Arabia

Author:

Al-Ali Aqeel Hamad1,Alraeyes Khalid Abdullah1,Julkarnain Princess Rhea1,Lakshmanan Arul Prasath1,Alobaid Alzahra1,Aljoni Ahmed Yahya1,Saleem Nada Hadi1,Al Odat Mohammed Ali2,Aletreby Waleed Tharwat2

Affiliation:

1. Respiratory Care Administration, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

2. Critical Care Department, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Abstract

Background: Mechanical ventilation provides essential support for critically ill patients in several diagnoses; however, extubation failure can affect patient outcomes. From Saudi Arabia, no study has assessed the factors associated with extubation failure in adults. Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted in the intensive care unit of a tertiary care hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Adult patients who had been mechanically ventilated via the endotracheal tube for a minimum of 24 hours and then extubated according to the weaning protocol were included. Failed extubation was defined as reintubation within 48 hours of extubation. Results: A total of 505 patients were included, of which 72 patients had failed extubation (14.3%, 95% CI: 11.4%–17.7%). Compared with the failed extubation group, the successfully extubated group had significantly shorter duration of mechanical ventilation (mean difference: −2.6 days, 95% CI: −4.3 to −1; P = 0.001), a slower respiratory rate at the time of extubation (mean difference: −2.3 breath/min, 95% CI: −3.8 to −1; P = 0.0005), higher pH (mean difference: 0.02, 95% CI: 0.001–0.04; P = 0.03), and more patients with strong cough (percent difference: 17.7%, 95% CI: 4.8%–30.5%; P = 0.02). Independent risk factors of failed extubation were age (aOR = 1.02; 95% CI: 1.002–1.03; P = 0.03), respiratory rate (aOR = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.01–1.1; P = 0.008), duration of mechanical ventilation (aOR = 1.08, 95% CI: 1.03 – 1.1; P < 0.001), and pH (aOR = 0.02, 95% CI: 0.0006–0.5; P = 0.02). Conclusion: Older age, longer duration of mechanical ventilation, faster respiratory rate, and lower pH were found to be independent risk factors that significantly increased the odds of extubation failure among adults.

Publisher

Medknow

Reference22 articles.

1. The outcome and predictors of failed extubation in intensive care patients – The elderly is an important predictor;Cheng;Int J Gerontol,2011

2. Ventilator-associated pneumonia among elderly Medicare beneficiaries in long-term care hospitals;Buczko;Health Care Financ Rev,2010

3. Prediction of extubation failure in medical intensive care unit patients;Saugel;J Crit Care,2012

4. Extubation failure in intensive care unit: Predictors and management;Kulkarni;Indian J Crit Care Med,2008

5. To extubate or not to extubate: Risk factors for extubation failure and deterioration with further mechanical ventilation;Xie;J Card Surg,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3