Stakeholder Analysis for Hypertension Management in the Context of the Indian Public Health System

Author:

Ghosh Nilanjana1,Karthikeyan Venkatesh2,Das Shubhabrata3,Boro Pallavi4,Chakraborty Sasthi Narayan5

Affiliation:

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Guwahati, Assam, India

2. Junior Resident, Department of Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, Bihar, India

3. Consultant (Medical), Indian Council of Medical Research - National Institute of Epidemiology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

4. Assistant Professor, Department of Community Medicine, Tomo Riba Institute of Health and Medical Sciences, Naharlagun, Arunachal Pradesh, India

5. Professor, Department of Community Medicine, SRIMS and Sanaka Hospital, Durgapur, West Bengal, India

Abstract

Abstract Background: Hypertension (HTN) portends a significant public health burden in India and calls for multi-stakeholder action. Objectives: We aimed to analyze the role of key stakeholder constituencies implicated in managing HTN across different levels of care within the public health system in India, alongside the enablers and barriers for effective program implementation. Methods: We reviewed 45 articles and policy documents, and 17 consenting stakeholder representatives scored the stakeholder constituencies for “power,” “position” and “interest.” They ranked enablers and barriers to noncommunicable disease programs in each of the six building blocks of the WHO Health System Strengthening Framework. Data were analyzed on Jamovi 2.2.2. Results: Policymakers/program managers emerged as the most critical stakeholder in influencing policy implementation (score for power: 23.3 ± 8.5, position: 25.4 ± 6.9, and interest: 22.1 ± 8.3). Beneficiaries ranked lowest (power: 10 ± 5.1, position: 12.3 ± 4.5, and interest: 19.4 ± 4.2). Effective “on-ground” implementation (“service delivery”) was the most important enabler (17.9 ± 3.3) as well as a barrier (17.6 ± 9.2). The health workforce (19.2 ± 4.8) emerged as a top barrier. Conclusion: To bring around impactful efficiency in the health system, provider-side interventions, especially those at the point of delivery, emerged as the need of the hour. Policymakers and program managers could lead using a top-down leadership and Governance Approach, focusing on deploying an adequately trained and motivated health workforce to deliver HTN services. For ensuring better performance of the health system for HTN care, the health workforce/seemed to be the “obligatory pivot.” Health-care providers could serve as the “point of convergence” of efforts made by all the stakeholder constituencies.

Publisher

Medknow

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3