Use of the term atypical cells in the reporting of ascitic fluid cytology: A caveat

Author:

Pai Radha Ramachandra1,Shenoy Krithika Damodar1,Minal Jessica2,Suresh Pooja K.1,Chakraborti Shrijeet3,Lobo Flora D.1

Affiliation:

1. Address: Department of Pathology, Kasturba Medical College Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India

2. Pathologist and Section Head, Division of Cytogenetics and FISH, Strand Life Sciences Private Limited, Health Care Global Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

3. Department of Histopathology, Leighton Hospital, Mid Cheshire NHS Hospitals Foundation Trust, Cheshire, United Kingdom

Abstract

Background: Abdominal paracentesis is a routine diagnostic procedure for assessment of patients with recent onset or worsening of ascites. Objectives: The objective of the study is to (1) review clinically confirmed cases of malignancy with negative, atypical, and suspicious cytology reports and provide reasoning for discrepancies and (2) recalculate sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values after review. Materials and Methods: Papanicolaou smears of ascitic fluid paracentesis samples received over one calendar year were reviewed retrospectively by an expert in cytopathology blinded to the final clinical and/or histopathological diagnoses. Cases with discrepancies after review were noted. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated before and after review of slides. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 16. Results: Malignant etiology was identified in 49/115 cases (42.6%) with female genital tract being the most common site of malignancy (22, 44.8%). The remaining 66 (57.4%) had a benign etiology with hepatic cirrhosis in 42 cases (63.6%). A review revealed discrepancies in five cases, three of which were earlier called negative for malignant cells (one case each of ovarian adenocarcinoma, cecal adenocarcinoma, and cholangiocarcinoma). Two cases of ovarian adenocarcinoma that were reported as atypical/reactive mesothelial hyperplasia showed malignant cells upon review. Sensitivity and specificity after review were 69.4% and 100%, respectively, with 100% positive predictive value. Conclusion: Being a minimally invasive procedure, abdominal paracentesis continues to be an important diagnostic tool in guiding patient management. A proper morphological assessment with adequate clinical information and correlation with other investigations can be used to arrive at a definitive diagnosis in most cases. The term “atypical” can be misleading and is often used for want of clinical information and is best avoided.

Publisher

Scientific Scholar

Subject

Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Reference21 articles.

1. An evidence-based manual for abdominal paracentesis;McGibbon;Dig Dis Sci,2007

2. Ascitic fluid analysis with special reference to serum ascites cholesterol gradient and serum-ascites albumin gradient;Sastry;Int J Res Sci,2017

3. Ascitic fluid analysis in differential diagnosis of ascites: Focus on cirrhotic ascites;Huang;J Clin Transl Hepatol,2014

4. European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL clinical practice guidelines on the management of ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, and hepatorenal syndrome in cirrhosis;J Hepatol,2010

5. The serum-ascites albumin gradient is superior to the exudate-transudate concept in the differential diagnosis of ascites;Runyon;Ann Intern Med,1992

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3