Simplified Sample Size Formulas for Detecting a Medically Important Effect

Author:

Indrayan Abhaya1,Mishra Aman1,Bhaskarapillai Binukumar2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Clinical Research, Max Healthcare, Saket, Delhi, India

2. Department of Biostatistics, NIMHANS, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

Abstract

The sample size is just about the most common question in the minds of many medical researchers. This size determines the reliability of the results and helps to detect a medically important effect when present. Some studies miss an important effect due to inappropriate sample size. Many postgraduate students and established researchers often contact a statistician to help them determine an appropriate sample size for their study. More than 80 formulas are available to calculate sample size for different settings and the choice requires some expertise. Their use is even more difficult because most exact formulas are quite complex. An added difficulty is that different books, software, and websites use different formulas for the same problem. Such discrepancy in the published formulas confounds a biostatistician also. The objective of this communication is to present uniformly looking formulas for many situations together at one place in their simple but correct form, along with the setting where they are applicable. This will help in choosing an appropriate formula for the kind of research one is proposing to do and use it with confidence. This communication is restricted to the sample size required to detect a medically important effect when present – known to the statisticians as the test of hypothesis situation. Such a collection is not available anywhere, not even in any book. The sample size formulas for estimation are different and not discussed here.

Publisher

Medknow

Reference19 articles.

1. Medical Biostatistics;Indrayan;CRC Press;,2018

2. The importance of beta, the type II error and sample size in the design and interpretation of the randomized control trial. Survey of 71 “negative” trials;Freiman;N Engl J Med,1978

3. Negative results of randomized clinical trials published in the surgical literature: Equivalency or error?;Dimick;Arch Surg,2001

4. Statistical Power Analysis for Mac and Windows

5. Power Analysis of Trials with Multilevel Data;Moerbeek,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3