Review of the Screening Guidelines for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: How to Choose Wisely

Author:

Bakshi Ravleen Kaur1,Kumar Akshay2,Gupta Vandana3,Radhika A.G.4,Misra Puneet5,Bhardwaj Pankaj6

Affiliation:

1. Scientist C, Div. RCN, ICMR-HQ, New Delhi, India

2. Dr. BR Ambedkar Institute of Medical Sciences, Mohali, Punjab, India

3. Research Officer, AIIMS, New Delhi, India

4. Senior Consultant, UCMS & GTB Hospital, Delhi, India

5. Professor, Centre for Community Medicine, AIIMS, New Delhi, India

6. Department of Community Medicine and Family Medicine, AIIMS, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India

Abstract

Abstract Currently, there is no international unanimity regarding the timings, the optimal cut-off points, and standardized methods of screening or diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). The screening guidelines and recommendations for GDM evolved over time; concise information has been presented here in the review. We searched electronic databases for various guidelines for screening of GDM in PubMed, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Embase, Cochrane, Google Scholar, Scopus, Guidelines International Network (GIN library), National Guidelines Clearinghouse (NGC); Web sites of relevant organizations; and trial registries. The mesh headings derived after reviewing the articles and were used to further search the articles are: (“Screening Guidelines GDM” or “Screening Criteria for GDM”) and (“Glucose Intolerance in Pregnancy” or “Gestational Diabetes Mellitus”). The articles published from 1960 till December 2022 were included. Key outcomes included the prevalence of GDM is 14.6% according to the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria and 13.4% according to Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group India (DIPSI) criteria, making the DIPSI criterion a cost-effective method for low-resource settings. The IADPSG) criterion diagnoses and treats GDM earlier, thus reducing the complications associated with GDM in the mother and newborn. The IADPSG criteria at a cut-off of ≥140 mg/dL have a sensitivity of 81% and specificity of 93%, whereas the World Health Organization (2013) criteria at the same cut-off has a lower sensitivity of 59% and specificity of 81%. The risk factors of having GDM are family history, history during past pregnancy, medical history, multiple current pregnancies, and raised hemoglobin A1c. The screening guidelines have been developed by different organizations and institutions over the years. The guidelines with the threshold values for screening and their standardization for detecting GDM in Indian mothers are yet to be established.

Publisher

Medknow

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference31 articles.

1. Summary and recommendations of the fourth international workshop-conference on gestational diabetes mellitus. The Organizing Committee;Metzger;Diabetes Care,1998

2. Gestational diabetes mellitus and subsequent development of overt diabetes mellitus;Damm;Dan Med Bull,1998

3. Pregnancy outcomes in women with gestational diabetes compared with the general obstetric population;Casey;Obstet Gynecol,1997

4. Gestational diabetes mellitus 2018 guidelines:An update;Mishra;J Family Med Prim Care,2018

5. Criteria for the oral glucose tolerance test in pregnancy;O'Sullivan;Diabetes,1964

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3