Functional Outcome of Patients with Malignant Tumors around the Knee Treated by Modular Endoprosthesis: A Comparative Study between Patellar Resurfacing and Nonresurfacing

Author:

Ebeid Walid Atef1,Mehanna Mohamed Taha A.2,Moustafa Mohamed Saleh2,ElNasr Khaled Mohamed Ahmed Abo2,ElFadl Sameh Mahmoud Abo2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Trauma, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt

2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Trauma, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt

Abstract

Abstract Background: Patellar resurfacing with knee arthroplasty has always been controversial. The literature contains data that support both resurfacing and not resurfacing the patella. However, the literature does not review a lot of studies that address the impact of patellar resurfacing on the functional outcome following resection of distal femur tumors and limb salvage using modular prosthesis. Questions/Purposes: Is patellar resurfacing better than nonresurfacing as regards functional outcome of modular prosthesis used for the treatment of tumors around the knee? Patients and Methods: Two groups of patients; both were subjected to wide excision of tumors around the knee and limb salvage using modular prosthesis. The first group underwent reconstruction with patellar resurfacing, while the second underwent reconstruction without patellar resurfacing. The age of these groups of patients ranged from 11 to 71 years. The patients were 17 males and 19 females. We evaluated patients using the musculoskeletal tumor society scoring system (MSTS), knee society final score, knee society function score, and anterior knee pain score. Results: We found that MSTS functional score, knee society final score and knee society function score, and anterior knee pain score were all better in patients who underwent patellar resurfacing compared to nonresurfacing patients. However, only the difference in anterior knee pain score was statistically significant (P = 0.030). Differences in other scores between these two groups were all statistically insignificant (P value of the MSTS difference = 0.103, P value of the knee society final score difference = 0.423, and P value of the knee society function score difference = 0.337). Conclusions: Patellar resurfacing could be helpful in decreasing anterior knee pain and the necessity to future surgeries addressing patellofemoral pain, especially in revision cases, patients with patellofemoral problems, and patients with extensor mechanism weakness and those with anterior knee pain. Since Anterior Knee Pain Scale was the only scoring system, among all scoring systems used, that confirmed a significant impact of patellar resurfacing on the outcome following resections and reconstructions; we cannot give an explicit strong recommendation favoring the routine patellar resurfacing in all cases undergoing resections and reconstructions using modular prosthesis. We recommend patellar resurfacing in older patients, based on our results, which show possible benefit of patellar resurfacing in older patients. We think that old age and the preexisting knee arthritis could be relative indications for patellar resurfacing.

Publisher

Medknow

Reference23 articles.

1. The role of patellar resurfacing in TKA;Dennis;Orthopedics,2006

2. Knee Arthroplasty:With or Without Patellar Component?;Arpád;Acta Medica Marisiensis,2015

3. Long-term results of primary total knee arthroplasty with and without patellar resurfacing;Park;Acta Med Okayama,2010

4. Patellar resurfacing in tumor endoprosthesis:a study in regard to power transmission;Tsuboyama;Chir Organi Mov,1994

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3