Short-Term Results after Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Abstract

Abstract Background: The loss of the shoulder’s center of rotation is caused by massive rotator cuff tears, which can occur with or without arthritis and proximal humerus fractures that are nonunion or malunion. Because anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty cannot provide a stable center of rotation, reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is the appropriate procedure for these indications and in older patients who have primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty carries a risk of failure because of the loosening of the glenoid component or cuff tear. The purpose of this study was to determine the short-term outcomes following RTSA in patients who had primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis, acute proximal humerus fractures, malunited or nonunited proximal humerus fractures, and massive cuff tears. Materials and Methods: This single-arm clinical trial (interventional study) was done in Ain Shams University Hospitals; 16 patients were included who underwent RTSA. Constant score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon score, Visual Analog Scale score, and range of motion (ROM) were the short-term outcomes. Patients with cuff tear arthropathy, irreparable cuff tear with or without glenohumeral arthritis, elderly patients with unreconstructable proximal humerus fracture, proximal humerus fracture malunion or nonunion, and patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis were included. Patients under the age of 50, as well as those with deltoid muscle dysfunction or injuries to the axillary nerve, were excluded. Results: There were 16 patients in this study, 8 of whom were male and 8 of whom were female. The follow-up period lasted 2 years following surgery, with a mean age of 64.19 years. The study included 7 patients with irreparable cuff tears one of them had associated anterior shoulder instability and recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation. One patient had a neglected shoulder dislocation, two patients had proximal humerus fracture dislocation, two patients had a nonunited proximal humerus fracture, three patients had unreconstructable proximal humerus fracture, and two had glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Conclusion: Not only did RTSA provide good clinical and functional outcomes for the standard indication of a massive cuff tear, but it also proved beneficial for other disorders such as primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis, nonunited fracture, and acute proximal humerus fracture. Among all indications, irreparable cuff tears yielded the highest results; nonunited fractures displayed the least improvement regarding clinical outcomes. Enhancements in the design of prostheses, the expertise of surgeons, and clinical outcomes are crucial to maximize their effectiveness in treating various shoulder disorders.