Clinical profile of adverse drug reactions in patients admitted to internal medicine wards of a tertiary care hospital

Author:

Tongaonkar Arnav1,Joshi Kavita1,Mulkalwar Alhad1,Dagli Setu2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine, Seth Gordhandas Sunderdas Medical College and King Edward Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

2. Intern, Lokmanya Tilak Municipal Medical College and Sion Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Abstract

Introduction: Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are unwanted, often harmful reaction resulting from a pharmacological intervention that warrants treatment, prevention, and future precautions. ADRs are highly prevalent with 10%–20% of patients suffering from one when admitted. The aim of this study was to identify cases and provide data on the incidence, severity, causality, and preventability of ADRs in a clinical setting in various age groups. The study also aimed to identify ADR risk factors which can be used to create ADR risk prediction models for application in everyday clinical practice to proactively detect patients at risk of developing these reactions. Materials and Methods: This was an inpatient, prospective, observational cohort study in the internal medicine ward of a major tertiary care hospital. Once the institutional ethics approval was obtained, patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were enrolled with informed consent. Their data were recorded in an ADR data form. These data were then analyzed using standardized scales to identify causality, severity, preventability, and avoidability along with specific risk factors and comparing them across age groups and drug classes. Results: One hundred and sixty-four patients were eligible and enrolled. Seventy percent of those suffering from ADRs were in the 30–60 years age group. Oral hypoglycemics and antituberculosis drugs were most commonly implicated, whereas metabolic and hepatic systems were the most frequent organ systems involved. Polypharmacy and hypertension were the most common risk factors identified. The cause of 96.3% of ADRs was probable, and 51.2% of the ADRs were categorized as severe. Nearly a fourth of the severe ADRs were categorized as life-threatening. A majority of the ADRs were treated by terminating the suspected drug, and 54% of patients recovered completely. 6.1% of the ADRs were definitely avoidable while 42.1% were unavoidable. Conclusion: This study clearly demonstrates the massive burden of ADRs, both on the patients and the hospitals. There is a dire need for a standardized, easily accessible means of mandatory reporting of ADRs, and that data need to be utilized to treat, decrease morbidity, and prevent ADRs by proactively anticipating them to ultimately improve patient care. The following core competencies are addressed in this article: Patient care, Medical knowledge, Interpersonal and communication skills, Practice-based learning and improvement, and Systems-based practice

Publisher

Medknow

Subject

Education,Health (social science)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3