International Endometrial Tumor Analysis (IETA) terminology for the evaluation of endometrial color flow and vascular pattern in women with abnormal uterine bleeding – a reproducibility study among ob-gyn ultrasound subspecialists in a tertiary training hospital

Author:

Yu Nina Rojana Lim1,Panlilio-Vitriolo Regina Rosario2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Manila Doctors Hospital, University of the Philippines - Philippine General Hospital, Manila, Philippines

2. Division of Ultrasound, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of the Philippines - Philippine General Hospital, Manila, Philippines

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The International Endometrial Tumor Analysis (IETA) group developed a catalog of standardized terms to describe findings that may be associated with uterine pathology. However, there is a lack of reliability studies for these descriptors in the literature. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to estimate interobserver and intraobserver reliability with regard to the IETA group descriptors for endometrial vascular characteristics in women with abnormal uterine bleeding. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five nonexpert and five expert raters assessed stored still images of transvaginal ultrasound examinations obtained from 68 women with abnormal uterine bleeding and endometrial thickening. Endometrial vascularity was evaluated using the IETA group descriptors for color flow and vascular pattern. Interobserver agreement was estimated by comparing the assessments of the nonexpert and expert raters. Intraobserver agreement was estimated by repeating the raters’ assessment after 4 weeks. Interrater agreement to the subjective assessment of an expert investigator was also computed. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The reproducibility of assigning IETA color score is good regardless of the degree of expertise of the rater, although the experts displayed better interobserver reliability (κ = 0.74 vs. 0.57) and intraobserver reliability (κ = 0.84 vs. 0.63). However, the reproducibility of describing IETA vascular patterns is significantly worse for both expert and nonexpert raters in both interobserver reliability (experts κ = 0.49 vs. 0.34) and intraobserver reliability (experts κ = 0.65 vs. 0.42). Both expert and nonexpert raters exhibited acceptable agreement with the reference standard, with experts performing better for both color score (κ = 0.79 vs. 0.70) and vascular pattern (κ = 0.63 vs. 0.44).

Publisher

Medknow

Reference14 articles.

1. POGS report on obstetrical and gynecological indicators of health care;Annette;Philipp J Obst Gynecol,2020

2. Diagnosis of abnormal uterine bleeding in reproductive-aged women;Levens;Pract Bull,2012

3. Insufficient endometrial biopsy results in women with abnormal uterine bleeding;Prendergast;Obstet Gynecol,2014

4. ACOG committee opinion no. 440: The role of transvaginal ultrasonography in the evaluation of postmenopausal bleeding;Obstet Gynecol,2009

5. Terms, definitions and measurements to describe the sonographic features of the endometrium and intrauterine lesions: A consensus opinion from the international endometrial tumor analysis (IETA) group;Leone;Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,2010

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3