Mindfulness in Different Sociodemographic Strata: Partial Validation of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale in an Indian Sample

Author:

Padhi Buddhaditya1,Kar Nilamadhab234,Kar Brajaballav5

Affiliation:

1. Department of Marketing, School of Management, KIIT University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India

2. Black Country Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Wolverhampton, UK

3. University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, UK

4. Faculty of Contemplative and Behavioral Sciences, Sri Sri University, Cuttack, Odisha, India

5. Department of Production and Operations Management, School of Management, KIIT University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India

Abstract

Background: Mindfulness-based interventions are increasing in clinical and nonclinical populations. It is important to have a culturally validated instrument to measure the construct. Aims: We intended to evaluate the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) in an Indian sample, for its reliability and dimensionality along with any differences among the sociodemographic strata. Settings and Design: The design of the study was an online-based survey. Materials and Methods: An anonymous survey was conducted involving adult participants with a convenience and snowball sampling method. Mindfulness based on MAAS responses and demographic details were collected. Statistical Analysis: Cronbach’s alpha, t-test, analysis of variance, Tukey’s honestly significant difference test, and factor analysis were used for analysis. Results: The average mindfulness score was 4.3 ± 0.78, and skewness was − 0.39. The score was normally distributed. The reliability for the MAAS (Cronbach’s α =0.830) was acceptable. The split-half reliability correlation was 0.66. The mean of item scores varied from 3.52 to 4.85, and the standard deviation varied from 1.2 to 1.6. The factor analysis explained 53% variance and identified four factors named as “inattention to the present,” “lost in thought,” “lack of circumstantial awareness,” and “late realization of feelings.” MAAS scores were significantly different across age, marital status, and occupation but did not differ by gender, education, or economic status. Conclusions: It appears that MAAS can be used in the Indian population; however, there is a need for further validation studies, in different specific populations.

Publisher

Medknow

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3