A qualitative and quantitative evaluation of smear layer removal efficacy of three different chelating agents using scanning electron microscopy and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry

Author:

Singh Gyanendra Pratap1,Attavar Shruthi H.1,Kavuri Sivaji2

Affiliation:

1. Private Practitioner, Specialty Dental Care, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India

2. Department of Conservative and Endodontics, A. B. Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, NITTE (Deemed to be University), Mangalore, Karnataka, India

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aim: The main goal of the present experimental research was to analyze the smear layer removal efficacy of chelating agents and correlate with the amount of calcium released from the radicular dentin with the canal space. Materials and Methods: Forty single-rooted teeth were exposed to standardized root canal instrumentation technique with copious amount of irrigation with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite solution between each instrumentation, following which the specimens were randomly allocated into four groups: Group I: 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), Group II 0.2% Chitosan, Group III Qmix™, and Group IV Control group with no final irrigation. After the irrigation protocol, the specimens were subjected to the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) evaluation to determine the smear layer removal efficacy and induced plasma mass spectrophotometric analysis was done to quantify the amount of calcium ions content in the irrigating solution. The data were statistically analyzed using Kruskal–Wallis and Dunnett’s tests for smear layer removal analysis. Quantitative data were interpreted by the analysis of variance and Tukey’s-Karmer test for the spectroscopic data analysis. Results: The result of the SEM analysis showed that there was no significant difference among the smear layer removal efficacy between the experimental groups with P > 0.05. The quantitative spectrophotometric data showed that the highest calcium ions release was from the 17% EDTA group followed by 0.2% chitosan and lesser from the Qmix™ group. Conclusion: Within the limitation of this in vitro experimental research, all the three experimental groups showed a better smear layer removal efficacy. EDTA showed the greater amount of mineral release compared to Qmix™ and chitosan group.

Publisher

Medknow

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3