Effect of somatotypes on lung volumes, capacities and respiratory impedance: A pilot study

Author:

Jaiswal Kumar Nischay1,Talwar Anjana1,Vayyat Shyam1,Bade Geetanjali G.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Physiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

Abstract

Background: The current morphological condition of an individual is described by a somatotype, which is a three-number scale. The endomorph, mesomorph and ectomorph components are presented in the same sequence, and each number corresponds to one of the three basic components of body composition. Methods: We recruited 50 healthy male subjects with a mean age of 24.10 ± 4.55 yrs. Somatotype was determined by the Heath and Carter method. Impulse oscillometry was performed followed by spirometry according to the European Respiratory Society (ERS) or American Thoracic Society (ATS) guidelines. Resistance at 5 Hz (R5) %pred, R20%pred, R5–R20, X5%pred, X20, area of reactance (Ax) and resonant frequency (Fres) were obtained by doing impulse oscillometry. Slow vital capacity (SVC), forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1), FEV1/FVC ratio and maximum mid-expiratory flow (MMEF) were assessed by doing spirometry. Results: Endomorphs (0.05 (0.00–0.09) vs 0.01 (0.00–0.04); P < 0.0001) and mesomorphs (0.04 (0.000.09) vs 0.01 (0.00–0.04); P = 0.002) had significantly higher R5–R20 than ectomorphs. Similarly, endomorphs (0.32 (0.07–0.82) vs 0.15 (0.08–0.35); P = 0.001) and mesomorphs (0.28 (0.17–0.64) vs 0.15 (0.08–0.35); P = 0.015) also showed significantly higher Ax than ectomorphs, Fres of endomorphs (15.37 (8.43–21.85) vs 10.08 (8.94–14.30); P < 0.0001) and mesomorphs (14.32 (10.24–20.86) vs 10.08 (8.94-14.30); P < 0.0001) were significantly high than ectomorphs. Moreover, spirometric measures reveal significant variation in which mesomorphs had significantly higher values of % predicted of FVC than ectomorphs (92.49 ± 7.211 vs 83.86 ± 7.861; P = 0.042) and the ratio of FEV1 to FVC was significantly higher in ectomorphs than in endomorphs (89.00 ± 5.80 vs 85.04 ± 5.73; P = 0.03). Conclusion: Peripheral airway dysfunction was observed in endomorphs and mesomorphs as compared to ectomorphs. Mesomorphs had a relatively higher FVC that may be due to their greater muscular strength.

Publisher

Medknow

Subject

Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Reference18 articles.

1. Somatotype, diet, and nutritional status of women;Lewis;J Anat,1991

2. Somatotype characteristics of normal-weight and obese women among different metabolic subtypes;Galić;Arch Endocrinol Metab,2016

3. Mohammadizadeh;Chatterjee;American Journal of Sports Science Sci,2019

4. Standardisation of spirometry;Miller;Eur Respir J,2005

5. Standardization of Spirometry 2019 Update. An Official American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society Technical Statement;Graham;Am J Respir Crit Care Med,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3