The Impact of a Collaborative Care Model on Health Trajectories among Patients with Co–Morbid Depression and Diabetes: The INDEPENDENT Study

Author:

Balasundaram Bhavani Sundari1,Mohan Anjana Ranjit1,Subramani Poongothai1,Ulagamathesan Venkatesan1,Tandon Nikhil2,Sridhar Gumpeny Ramachandra3,Sosale Aravind Ramachandra4,Shankar Radha1,Sagar Rajesh5,Rao Deepa6,Chwastiak Lydia6,Mohan Viswanathan1,Ali Mohammed Kumail7,Patel Shivani Anil7

Affiliation:

1. Department of Clinical Trials, Madras Diabetes Research Foundation, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

2. Department of Endocrinology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi, India

3. Endocrine and Diabetes Centre, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India

4. DIACON Hospital, Diabetes Care and Research Centre, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

5. Department of Psychiatry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi, India

6. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, USA

7. Hubert Department of Global Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia

Abstract

Abstract Context: Collaborative care models for depression have been successful in a variety of settings, but their success may differ by patient engagement. We conducted a post-hoc analysis of the INDEPENDENT trial to investigate the role of differential engagement of participants on health outcomes over 3 years. Settings and Design: INDEPENDENT study was a parallel, single-blinded, randomised clinical trial conducted at four socio-economically diverse clinics in India. Participants were randomised to receive either active collaborative care or usual care for 12 months and followed up for 24 months. Method: We grouped intervention participants by engagement, defined as moderate (≤7 visits) or high, (8 or more visits) and compared them with usual care participants. Improvements in composite measure (depressive symptoms and at least one of three cardio-metabolic) were the primary outcome. Statistical Analysis: Mean levels of depression and cardio-metabolic measures were analysed over time using computer package IBM SPSS Statistics 25. Results: The composite outcome was sustained the highest in the moderate engagers [27.5%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 19.5, 36.7] and the lowest in high engagers (15.8%, 95% CI: 8.1, 26.8). This pattern was observed for individual parameters – depressive symptoms and glycosylated haemoglobin. Progressive reductions in mean depressive symptom scores were observed for moderate engagers and usual care group from baseline to 36 months. However, in high engagers of collaborative care, mean depressive symptoms were higher at 36 months compared to 12 months. Conclusion: Sustained benefits of collaborative care were larger in participants with moderate engagement compared with high engagement, although a majority of participants relapsed on one or more outcome measures by 36 months. High engagers of collaborative care for co-morbid depression and diabetes may need light touch interventions for longer periods to maintain health and reduce depressive symptoms.

Publisher

Medknow

Subject

Endocrinology,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism,Endocrinology,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3