Comparison of Global Longitudinal Strain in Dual-chamber versus Ventricular Pacemaker in Complete Heart Block

Abstract

Abstract Context: Bradycardia caused by total atrioventricular block (TAVB) is treated by implantation of permanent pacemakers (PPMs) in either dual-chamber (DDD) versus ventricular (VVI) pacing modes. DDD is considered a more physiological pacing mode than VVI as it avoids atrioventricular dyssynchrony. However, previous trials have failed to demonstrate the superiority of DDD in improving quality of life and morbidity. Aims: This study aims to provide postpacemaker function of the left ventricle (LV) measured with global longitudinal strain (GLS), in TAVB patients. Settings and Design: This is a comparative study; samples included in the study are adult TAVB patients undergoing PPM implantation, without significant heart function, and structural abnormality. Echocardiographic parameters are obtained before, after 1 month, and after 3 months post-PPM. Subjects and Methods: A total of 98 TAVB patients undergoes PPM implantation during the study period, 55 patients were excluded, and in the end, only 43 patients fulfill the inclusion criteria. Statistical Analysis Used: Baseline data between DDD and VVI are compared using unpaired t-test. Statistical significance 1 month post-PPM and 3 months post-PPM is analyzed using paired t-test. Results: There were no significant differences between both groups at baseline. However, significant GLS changes are observed 1 month after PPM in the VVI group (P = 0.002), but no significant change was observed in the DDD group even after 3 months (P = 0.055). Conclusions: In our study, we conclude that DDD is superior in maintaining LV function in the short term in TAVB patients after PPM implantation.