Assessment of the Peripheral Venous Cannulation in a Teaching Hospital: A Prospective Study

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction: In today’s healthcare environment, peripheral venous cannulations are frequently performed procedures. Bloodstream infections could occur as a result of the intrusive operation. Peripheral venous cannulas should be inserted and managed according to specific rules. This study compared these standards to the peripheral venous cannulation procedure and results at a teaching hospital institution. Materials and Methods: This study investigated the procedure and results of peripheral venous cannulation in a teaching center using a prospectively completed audit loop study. The “Royal College of Nursing’s criteria for infusion therapy” is one such set of recommendations. After the first phase of the observations, the audit was conducted. Later, after 4 months based on the recommendations, the personnel received training on a variety of cannulation-related topics and the second set of observations for the cannulations was performed. Both observations were made and compared for significance that was considered at. 05 using the ANOVA. Results: During the first phase of the research, 212 cannulations were made, and 314 were made for the second phase to be audited. In the reaudit compared with the initial audit, there was a statistically substantial surge in documentation, cannula cleansing, glove use, suitable site selection, and hand cleanliness, according to comparative exploration. Moreover, there was a statistically substantial decline in recannulations. Conclusion: Even though peripheral intravenous cannulation is a straightforward process, if done incorrectly, it might have serious side effects. Such techniques’ auditing reveals performance flaws. Reaudit results reveal a noticeable increase in performance and outcome following proper personnel retraining.