Clinical Evaluation of the Retention of Four Different Pit and Fissure Sealants on the First Permanent Molars – An Original Research

Author:

Rajkumari Laleena1,Verma Rajnish K.2,Rajmohan M.3,Thakkar Radhika4,Menon Ipseeta5,Kumar Sandeep6

Affiliation:

1. Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Dentofacial and Kids Dental Care, Imphal East, Manipur, India

2. Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Kalinga Institute of Dental Sciences, Campus 5, KIIT University, Patia, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India

3. Department of Dental Surgery, KAPV Government Medical College and Hospital, Trichy, Tamil Nadu, India

4. BDS, Eastman Institute for Oral Health, University of Rochester, New York, United States

5. Department of Public Health Dentistry, Kalinga Institute of Dental Sciences, KIIT Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India

6. Department of Public Health Dentistry, Dental Institute, RIMS Ranchi, Jharkhand, India

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective: In this study, the retention rates of four different pit and fissure sealant materials on the first permanent molars were clinically assessed and compared. Materials and Methods: A total of 120 kids aged 7 to 10 participated in a randomized controlled experiment. On their first permanent teeth, the subjects each got one of the four sealant materials (A, B, C, or D). Over the course of 24 months, the retention rates were evaluated every 6 months. The Chi-square test and Kaplan–Meier survival analysis were used for statistical analysis. Results: At 6, 12, 18, and 24 months, the following retention rates were observed overall: A (85%, 78%, 65%, 52%), B (90%, 82%, 70%, 60%), C (78%, 70%, 55%, 42%), and D (95%, 88%, 75%, 62%). At each time point, the sealant materials showed significant variations in retention rates (P 0.05). While sealants A and C showed lower retention rates, sealant D showed the best retention rates, followed by sealant B. Conclusion: This study shows that different materials have different retention rates for pit and fissure sealants on first permanent molars. Higher retention rates for sealants D and B suggest that they may be superior than sealants A and C. These results highlight how crucial it is to choose the right sealant materials to guarantee long-term retention and effectiveness in avoiding dental cavities.

Publisher

Medknow

Reference12 articles.

1. The global burden of oral diseases and risks to oral health;Petersen;Bull World Health Organ,2005

2. A reappraisal of the quantitative relationship between sugar intake and dental caries:The need for new criteria for developing goals for sugar intake;Sheiham;BMC Public Health,2014

3. Evidence-based clinical recommendations for the use of pit-and-fissure sealants:A report of the American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs;Beauchamp;J Am Dent Assoc,2008

4. The Hall Technique 10 years on:Questions and answers;Innes;Br Dent J,2017

5. Sealants for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth;Ahovuo-Saloranta;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2013

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3