Single-Piece Implant Systems and its Longterm Stability: An Evaluative Research

Author:

Javiya Piyush1,Rajakumari Kandra2,Gorrepati Sravya3,Srilakshmi Donka4,Mansoor Manawar Ahmad5,Abdul Hina Naim5,Baig Fawaz Abdul Hamid6

Affiliation:

1. Department of Prosthodontics, Crown and Bridge, K. M. Shah Dental College and Hospital, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth Deemed to be University, Piparia, Waghodia, Vadodara, Gujarat, India

2. Department of Prosthodontics, G.Pulla Reddy Dental College and Hospital, Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh, India

3. BDS, Kamineni Institute of Dental Sciences, Nalgonda, Telangana, India

4. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, RKDF Dental College and Research Centre, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India

5. Department of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

6. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, King Khalid University College of Dentistry, Abha, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective: The objective of this research was to compare the longstanding stability of single-piece implant systems to typical two-piece systems by analyzing patient records retrospectively. Methods: A retrospective examination of patient records from January 2010 to December 2020 was undertaken at the Department of Oral Implantology, University Hospital. The research included dental rehabilitation patients who got single- or two-piece implant systems. Patient demographics, implant features, surgical procedures, and follow-up results were extracted. Implant success rates, stability defined by resonance frequency analysis (RFA) utilizing Osstell ISQ®, and peri-implant bone loss evaluated by standardized periapical radiographs at baseline and follow-up visits were the main outcomes. Results: The research involved 320 patients (160 per cohort). The average patient age was 52.7 years, with 55% men. The mandibular region received 65% of implants, and the maxillary region the rest. Single-piece cohort A had 94.6% implant success, and two-piece cohort B 96.2%. Implant success rates were similar between cohorts (P = 0.412). The mean ISQ scores were 72.4 ± 4.8 in cohort A and 74.8 ± 5.1 in cohort B (P = 0.086). Peri-implant bone loss was 1.8 ± 0.7 mm in cohort A and 1.4 ± 0.6 mm in cohort B (P = 0.031). Conclusion: Single-piece implant systems provide a stable and successful alternative to classic two-piece systems. However, patient selection, surgical technique, and monitoring are essential to reduce peri-implant problems and improve clinical results. To improve implant dentistry patient care and evidence-based clinical practice, single-piece and two-piece implant systems’ design, biomechanical features, and longstanding performance should be studied.

Publisher

Medknow

Reference10 articles.

1. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants:A review and proposed criteria of success;Albrektsson;Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants,1986

2. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period;Branemark;Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl,1977

3. What is the effect on outcomes of time-to-loading of a fixed or removable prosthesis placed on implant(s)?;Jokstad;Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants,2007

4. Single-tooth Morse taper connection implants placed in fresh extraction sockets of the anterior maxilla:An aesthetic evaluation;Mangano;Clin Oral Implants Res,2013

5. Bone response to loaded implants with non-matching implant-abutment diameters in the canine mandible;Cochran;J Periodontol,2009

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3