Exploring the use of Virtual Surgical Planning (VSP) in Maxillofacial Reconstructions-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Exploring the use of Virtual Surgical Planning (VSP) in Maxillofacial Reconstructions

Published:2024-05-24 Issue:Suppl 3 Volume:16 Page:S2312-S2314
ISSN:0976-4879
Container-title:Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Guruprasad Yadavalli¹,Laskar Shyamalendu²,Patadiya Mohammed Mohsin Moosabhai³,Gowdar Inderjit Murugendrappa⁴,Parihar Anuj Singh⁵,Singh Karandeep⁶,Makkad Ramanpal Singh⁷

Affiliation:

1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Government Dental College and Research Institute, VIMS Campus, Cantonment, Ballari, Karnataka, India

2. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Index Institute of Dental Sciences, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India

3. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Karnavati Dental College, Karnavati University, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India

4. Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Prince Sattam Bin Abdul Aziz University, Alkharj, KSA

5. Department of Periodontology, People’s Dental Academy, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India

6. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dental Sciences, SGT University, Budhera, Gurugram-Badli Road, Gurugram, Haryana, India

7. Department of Oral Medicine And Radiology, New Horizon Dental College and Research Institute, Sakri, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, India

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background: Virtual surgical planning (VSG), also known as computer-assisted reconstruction, has started to become the norm for more complex patients in many centers in recent times. Aim: This study was conducted to evaluate the VSG in maxillofacial reconstruction surgery. Methods and Materials: This study included 20 patients who underwent surgery for maxillofacial reconstruction. The study participants were divided into two main categories: Category 1: Conventional surgical planning (CSG). Category 2: VSG. The surgical planning in both categories, including the evaluation of volume of defect, length, width, and height of graft, to be placed. Results: The gap between defect to be reconstructed and graft placed was greater in CSG as compared to VSG. The distance of graft from actual location was lesser in VSG as compared to CSG. The findings were significant statistically. Frequency of success was 93.21% and 97.47%, respectively. The frequency of success was greater in VSG as compared to CSG. Conclusion: Virtual surgical planning is more effective in maxillofacial reconstruction surgery.

Publisher

Medknow

Reference9 articles.

1. Technical procedures for template-guided surgery for mandibular reconstruction based on digital design and manufacturing;Liu;Biomed Eng Online,2014

2. A traumatic ulcer caused by accidental lip biting following topical anesthesia: A case report;Tiwari;Cureus,2023

3. Computer-assisted versus conventional free fibula technique for craniofacial reconstruction: An outcomes comparison;Seruya;Plast Reconstr Surg,2013

4. Comparative evaluation of dentinal defects after root canal preparation using various nickel titanium files: An in vitro study;Batra;Cureus,2023

5. Virtual surgical planning in complex composite maxillofacial reconstruction;Saad;Plast Reconstr Surg,2013