Evaluation of the Impact of Different Surface Treatments on Implant Surface: An In Vitro Study

Author:

Jalaluddin Mohammad1,Subramanian Deepa2,Mathew Joel3,Mailankote Shilpa4,Almuraikhi Turki5,Daghriri Alhussain5

Affiliation:

1. Department of Periodontics and Oral Implantology, Kalinga Institute of Dental Sciences, KIIT Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India

2. Department of Prosthodontics, RVS Dental College and Hospital, Sulur, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India

3. Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Mar Baselios Dental College, Kothamangalam, Ernakulam, Kerala, India

4. Department of Public Health Dentistry, AB Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences (ABSMIDS), Nitte (Deemed to be University), Mangalore, Karnataka, India

5. Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Majmaah University, AL-Majmaah, Saudi Arabia

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aim: The current study was conducted to assess the effects of various surface treatments on the implant surface. Materials and Methods: A total of 45 dental implants measuring 16 mm in length and 5 mm in diameter were used, along with the appropriate abutments. Depending on the surface treatment used, the samples were randomly split into three groups, with 15 implants in each group: Group 1: Control, Group 2: UV light-treated, Group 3: Sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA)-treated. After surface treatment, a scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used to assess the test samples’ surface properties. All sample images were captured using a 3000× magnification. After all three groups’ surfaces were treated, the surface roughness was measured using a digital optical profilometer with a stylus speed of 0.5 mm/s that was connected to computer software. Results: The maximum surface roughness was found in the group treated with SLA (0.714 ± 0.12), followed by the group treated with UV light (0.692 ± 0.09) and the control group (0.516 ± 0.12). There was a significant difference found between different surface treatment methods. Conclusion: The present study concluded that the group that received the SLA treatment had the highest surface roughness when compared to the UV light and control groups.

Publisher

Medknow

Reference15 articles.

1. Effects of roughness pitch of surfaces on their wettability;Nakae;J Mater Sci,2005

2. Relationship between surface properties (roughness, wettability) of titanium and titanium alloys and cell behaviour;Ponsonnet;Mater Sci Eng C,2003

3. Effectiveness of different chemotherapeutic agents for decontamination of infected dental implant surface: A systematic review;Patil;Antibiotics (Basel),2022

4. Citric acid in the passivation of titanium dental implants: Corrosion resistance and bactericide behavior;Verdeguer;Materials (Basel),2022

5. Characterization and biocompatibility of a titanium dental implant with a laser irradiated and dual-acid etched surface;Hsu;Biomed Mater Eng,2007

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3