Estimation of Loss of Crestal Bone Around Dental Implants in Various Tissue Biotypes Using CBCT-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Estimation of Loss of Crestal Bone Around Dental Implants in Various Tissue Biotypes Using CBCT

Published:2023-12-20 Issue: Volume: Page:
ISSN:0976-4879
Container-title:Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Algethmi Abdullah Saeed¹,Chowdary Koduru Ranga Roy²,Almansour Hosain Mohammed Hosain³,Dhal Angurbala⁴,Khan Nubesh⁵,Parihar Anuj Singh⁶,Reddy Naveen⁷

Affiliation:

1. Department of Restorative and Implant Dentistry, King Fahd Armed Force Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

2. Registrar Prosthodontics, Al Janah Medical Complex, Ar Rass, Saudi Arabia

3. Consultant, Department of Dental Implant, MOH, Najran Dental Specialist Center, Najran, Saudi Arabia

4. Associate Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, SCB Dental College and Hospital, Cuttack, India

5. Assistant Professor, Department of Preventive Dentistry, College of Dentistry in Ar Rass, Qassim University, Al-Qassim, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

6. Reader, Department of Periodontology, People’s Dental Academy, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India

7. Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Saudi Arabia

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objectives: To evaluate the loss of crestal bone height around dental implants placed in various tissue biotypes. Materials and Methods: 20 patients with single edentulous sites were allocated randomly, with 10 samples in each into Group I (implants were placed in thick tissue biotype) and Group II (implants were placed in thin tissue biotype). Baseline cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was performed after implant placement in both groups, and follow-up CBCT was taken at the time of cementation prior to occlusal loading to assess the crestal bone loss around the mesial and distal side of implants in both groups. Result: A significant loss of crestal bone at both the distal and mesial sides of the implants at the time of cementation was observed in both groups but Group II showed more crestal bone loss as compared to Group I. Conclusion: Mean crestal bone loss was more in Group II (thin tissue biotype) in comparison to Group I (thick tissue biotype). The thick biotype causes less crestal bone changes than the thin biotype, which evokes more loss of crestal bone during the period of peri-implant healing.

Publisher

Medknow

Subject

General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,Bioengineering,General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,Bioengineering

Reference5 articles.

1. Evaluation of interproximal crestal bone loss around Straumann implants after the 1st year of loading in panoramic radiography;Abdinian;SRM J Res Dent Sci,2016

2. CBCT evaluation of crestal bone loss around dental implants placed in different tissue biotypes:A radiographical study;Mushtaq;Int J Contemp Med Res,2022

3. Evaluation of crestal bone loss around implants placed at equicrestal and subcrestal levels before loading:A prospective clinical study;Nagarajan;J Clin Diagn Res,2015

4. Early marginal bone loss around immediately loaded one-piece and two-piece dental implants following immediate or delayed loading. A prospective study;Aragoneses;J Osseointegr,2021

5. Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of horizontal and vertical dimensional changes in buccal peri-implant alveolar bone and soft tissue:A 1-year prospective clinical study;Kaminaka;Clin Implant Dent Relat Res,2014