Evaluation and Comparison of Impact Strength and Transverse Strength of Heat Polymerized Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) Denture Base Resin Repaired Using Heat Polymerizied PMMA Denture Base Resin, Auto-Polymerized PMMA Resin and A New Light Polymerizied Denture Resin: An In Vitro Study

Author:

Ajmal B Mohammed1,Kushalappa PB Dhyan2,Ahamed Saadath Afzaa S.3,Kaur Manpreet4,Shetty Akshay1,Minz Manisha5,Saleem C Mohammed1,Raheel Syed A.6

Affiliation:

1. Department of Prosthodontics, KGF College of Dental Sciences, Kolar, Karnataka, India

2. Department of Dentistry, Kodagu Institute of Medical Sciences and Teaching Hospital, Madekeri, Karnataka, India

3. Department of Prosthodontics Crown Bridge and Implantology, Sri Rajiv Gandhi College of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Bengaluru, India

4. Department of Dentistry, Kodagu District Hospital, Madikeri, Karnataka, India

5. Department of Prosthodontics, Government Dental College, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India

6. Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, KGF College of Dental Sciences, Kolar, Karnataka, India

Abstract

ABSTRACT Context: Repaired denture prosthesisdemands adequate transverse and impact strength. A new repairdenture base resin- “Lukafix” require to fulfil these criteria. Aims: This study evaluates and compares the transverse and impact strength of heat polymerizing, auto polymerizing and LUKAfix denture resin. Methods and Material: 20 specimens were control(without repair), and other were test specimens which were fractured and repaired with heat polymerized PMMA resin, chemically polymerized PMMA resin and LUKAfix light polymerizing denture resin. Each group wasdivided in two subgroups. Subgroup A was subjected to transverse strength test and subgroup B to impact strength test. Statistical Analysis Used: One way ANOVA was used to identify the mean difference among the four groups. Post-Hoc-Bonferroni was done to observe the difference between the groups. Results: Maximum transverse strength was observed in specimens repaired with heat polymerized (48.33 ± 9.19) and least in LUKAfix denture resin (6.56 ± 1.15). Also, impact strength was maximum for heat polymerized (3.64 ± 0.41) followed by LUKAfix denture resin (2.34 ± 0.44). Conclusions: Repair with LUKAfix denture resin resulted inferior transverse and impact strength as compared to heat polymerized PMMA resin.

Publisher

Medknow

Subject

General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,Bioengineering,General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,Bioengineering

Reference15 articles.

1. In vitro comparison of two different materials for the repair of urethan dimethacrylate denture bases;Cilingir;J Adv Prosthodont,2013

2. Physical properties of four acrylic denture base resins;Meng;J Contemp Dent Pract,2005

3. Denture fracture–A survey;Darbar;Br Dent J,1994

4. Impact strength of denture base and reline acrylic resins:An in vitro study;Machado;J Dent Biomech,2012

5. Prevalence of complete denture fracture A retrospective study;Rajesh;PalArch's Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3