Comparison of Piezosurgery Devices and the Use of Rotatory Devices for the Extraction of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars

Author:

Walia Sheffali1,Verma Dinesh2,Bansal Shallu3,Sutar Smita4,Gupta Asheen5,Kardwal Kapil6

Affiliation:

1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Sri Guru Ram Das Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Amritsar, Punjab, India

2. Department of Dentistry, AIIMS, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, India

3. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Geetanjali Dental and Research Institute, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India

4. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dr. Rajesh Ramdasji Kambe Dental College, Kaneri Sarap, Akola, Maharashtra, India

5. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dasmesh Institute of Research and Dental Sciences, Faridkot, Punjab, India

6. Dr. Kardwals’ Dental and Face Surgery Hospital, Rawatsar, Rajasthan, India

Abstract

ABSTRACT The present study aimed to examine the extraction of impacted mandibular third molars by using rotatory and piezosurgery equipment. Twenty-five patients of both genders who required surgery to remove their third molars were split into two groups (control group and research group). In the surgical extraction of the impacted mandibular third molar, in the study group, a piezotome was used to remove the bone, while in the control group, a bur was used. Patients’ acceptance of bone cutting, the length of the operation, discomfort and bleeding during the procedure, postoperative pain, swelling, trismus, and wound healing were evaluated. A statistically insignificant difference was observed for age and difficulty index. The intraoperative bleeding was similar in both groups. Both the groups tolerated the bone cutting well, with slightly better values for the piezo group. Based on Pederson’s difficulty index, the scores of difficulty of extraction of the impacted tooth were measured between the groups. The slight difficulty was observed in 9 (36%) each in the study group and control group. The moderate difficulty in 14 (56%) of control group and 15 (60%) of study group. Severe difficulty was found among 2 (8%) in the control group and 1 (4%) in the study group. The difference was not significant (P > 0.05). Intraoral bleeding was moderately seen in 25 in both groups. Among the study and control groups respectively no intraoperative pain was seen in 14 and 16, mild intraoperative pain in 11 and 7, and moderate intraoperative pain in 0 and 2. Among group I and II acceptance to bone cutting was comfortably seen in 24 and 23, bearable in 1 and 2 respectively. The difference was not significant (P > 0.05). Piezosurgery and bur were comparable in evaluating patient acceptance, intraoperative duration, intraoperative bleeding and pain, postoperative pain, edema, trismus, and wound healing.

Publisher

Medknow

Reference11 articles.

1. Piezosurgery –A precise and safe new oral surgery technique;Schlee;Aust Dent Pract,2009

2. Piezosurgery:An ultrasound device for cutting bone and its use and limitations in maxillofacial surgery;Eggers;British J Oral Maxillofacial Surg,2004

3. Piezosurgery in head and neck oncological and reconstructive surgery:Personal experience on 127 cases;Crosetti;Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital,2009

4. Piezosurgery:A boon for modern periodontics;Thomas;J Int Soc Prev Community Dent,2017

5. The use of piezosurgery as an alternative method of minimally invasive surgery in the authors'experience;Mansur;Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne,2013

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3