Evaluation of Bond Strength and Adhesive Remnant Index of Different Lingual Retainers in Human Incisor Teeth

Author:

Sowmya Cherukupalli1,Brahmini Puthamakula1,Thimmaiah Manjula K.2,Thakkar Radhika3,Kumar Sandeep4,Naik Moode K.5

Affiliation:

1. Department of Orthodontics, Panineeya Dental College and Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India

2. Department of Orthodontics, Sri Siddhartha Dental College and Hospital, Tumkur, Karnataka, India

3. BDS, Eastman Institute for Oral Health, University of Rochester, NY, USA

4. Department of Public Health Dentistry, Dental Institute, RIMS Ranchi, Jharkhand, India

5. Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Government Dental College and Hospital, ESI Road, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh, India

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the bond strengths of four different lingual retainers and assess the adhesive remnant index (ARI) to determine their effectiveness in orthodontic retention. Methodology: Eighty human incisor teeth were divided into four groups, with each group bonded using a different retainer: Group 1 (E-Glass retainer), Group 2 (0.017” Co-axial stainless steel wire), Group 3 (Splint C.T. fiber mesh), and Group 4 (0.010” stainless steel ligature wire). Bond strength was measured using a universal testing machine, and ARI scores were recorded to assess bond failure types. Results: Group 1 (E-Glass retainer) demonstrated the highest bond strength, followed by Group 3 (Splint C.T. fiber mesh), Group 2 (Co-axial stainless steel wire), and Group 4 (stainless steel ligature wire). Cohesive bond failures were observed in most groups, except for the co-axial stainless steel wire group, which exhibited adhesive failures. Conclusion: E-Glass fiber-reinforced retainers showed the highest bond strength, making them a promising alternative to conventional stainless steel wires for orthodontic retention, especially in patients with esthetic concerns or nickel hypersensitivity. Stainless steel retainer groups exhibited lower bond strengths, and cohesive bond failures were prevalent. Further research is needed to validate these findings in clinical settings and evaluate the long-term effectiveness of different lingual retainers.

Publisher

Medknow

Reference15 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3