Retrospective Analysis of Dental Implant Failure Rates in Patients with Compromised Health-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Retrospective Analysis of Dental Implant Failure Rates in Patients with Compromised Health

Published:2023-04-28 Issue:Suppl 2 Volume:15 Page:S1149-S1151
ISSN:0976-4879
Container-title:Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Bidyasagar Bal Sourav C.¹,Awinashe Vaibhav N.²,Jindal Pankaj³,Khader Anas Abdul⁴,Almutairi Faris J.⁵,Parihar Anuj Singh⁶,Ramaiah Vardarajula V.⁷

Affiliation:

1. Department of Public Health Dentistry, Institute of Dental Sciences, Siksha ‘O’ Anusandhan University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India

2. Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry in Ar Rass, Qassim University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

3. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Pacific Dental College and Research Centre, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India

4. Department of Preventive Dentistry, College of Dentistry in Ar Rass, Qassim University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

5. Department of Maxillofacial Surgery and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Dentistry, Qassim University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

6. Department of Periodontology, People’s Dental Academy, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India

7. Department of Dental Hygiene, College of Applied Health Sciences in Ar Rass, Qassim University, Saudi Arabia

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objectives: The goal of the current research was to compare the failure rate of dental implants in medically compromised patients to healthy individuals. Materials and Methods: In this seven years retrospective study, 50 patients from Group A who were medically compromised had 63 implants, while 50 patients from Group B who were healthy had 67 implants. Over 1 mm of bone loss around the implant in the first year and over 0.2 mm of bone loss per year after that were considered failure rates. Result: Two (2.9%) of the dental implants in Group B and 18 (28.6%) in Group A, both failed. The average bone loss around the implant in Group A during the first year was 1.21 mm, compared to 0.3 mm in Group B. Conclusion: Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus group had greater implant failure.

Publisher

Medknow

Subject

General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,Bioengineering,General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,Bioengineering

Reference8 articles.

1. Evaluation of dental implants failure rate of in patients with various medical conditions;Syed;Int J Cur Res Rev,2021

2. Long-term retrospective study based on implant success rate in patients with risk factor:15-year follow-up;Kandasamy;J Contemp Dent Pract,2018

3. Retrospective evaluation of success of dental implants in medically compromised patients;Singh;J Adv Med Dent Scie Res,2018

4. Assessment of dental implants in medically compromised patients:A retrospective study;Khajuria;HECS Int J Com Health and Med Res,2018

5. Evaluation for survival rate of implants in medically compromised individuals;Shetty;Int J Dentistry Oral Sci,2021