A Comparative Study to Assess Accuracy of Casts Prepared using Direct Impression Technique with and without Splinting of Multiple Dental Implants Utilising Two Different Splinting and Impression Materials

Author:

Karia Milap1,Vaghela Ishita2,Ajmera Hardik3,Detroja Kishan4,Vasant Jill D5,Sharma Devanshi6,Kumar Amit7,Badiyani Bhumika Kamal7

Affiliation:

1. Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, M.D.S. [Associate Professor], Government Dental College and Hospital, Jamnagar, Gujarat, India

2. Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, M.D.S. [Assistant Professor], Government Dental College and Hospital, Jamnagar, Gujarat, India

3. Department of Orthodontics, M.D.S. [Associate Professor] Government Dental College and Hospital, Vadodhara, Gujrat, India

4. MDS, Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Senior Lecturer, College of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Amargadh, Bhavnagar, Gujrat, India

5. Clinical Practitioner, Gujrat, India

6. MDS, Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, Clinical Practitioner, Valsad, Gujrat, India

7. Associate Professor, Department of Public Health Dentistry, Clinical Practitioner, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background: The current study examined the accuracy of casts generated using direct impression processes with and without splints for multiple dental implants utilizing two different splinting materials and impression materials. Materials and Methods: Dental replacement base intensity alleviating acrylic tar was used to create a reference model of a mandible with four inserts (Uniti, Equinox, D-3.7 mm, and L-13 mm) in the front. Polyether and polyvinyle siloxane impression materials were used to make impressions of the reference model utilizing direct non-splinted and splinted techniques. Results: Polyether impression material was found to produce more accurate impressions than polyvinyl siloxane, and impressions made using transfer copings splinted with pattern resins were found to be more accurate than those made using either unsplinted copings or copings splinted with light-cured wax resin. Conclusions: All six impression techniques resulted in casts that were different from the reference model. Next, the polyether-splinted (SPR) technique is the nonsplinted technique employing polyether and polyvinyle siloxane imprint materials, and then, the splinted techniques using polyether and polyvinyle siloxane and produced the most accurate casts in comparison with the reference model.

Publisher

Medknow

Subject

General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,Bioengineering,General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,Bioengineering

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3