When Impedance Trend Lies, Remote Monitoring Helps for Diagnosis-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

When Impedance Trend Lies, Remote Monitoring Helps for Diagnosis

Published:2023-07 Issue:2 Volume:5 Page:87-90
ISSN:2666-6979
Container-title:Annals of Clinical Cardiology
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Scicchitano Marco¹^ORCID,Schirripa Valentina²,Loricchio Maria Luisa²,Castro Antonio²,Iulianella Renzo Venanzio²,Perna Silvia²,Centurion Carlos Aznaran²,Albano Bruno²,Rizzo Veronica¹,Granatelli Antonino²

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiology, CVT Electrophysiology Division, Sandro Pertini Hospital, Rome, Italy

2. Department of Cardiology, Electrophysiology Division, Sandro Pertini Hospital, Rome, Italy

Abstract

Abstract We described the fracture of an ICD lead in a patient at the third device replacement.Through the remote monitoring electric interference was detected on the defibrillator lead despite the pacing and shock impedances during the leadlifetime remained stable and in a normal range. X-ray confirmed the lead failure and patient underwent to a lead replacement.

Publisher

Medknow

Reference9 articles.

1. Chronic performance of riata 1580 and Endotak 0158 ICD leads:A single center 10-year experience;Cobb;Pacing Clin Electrophysiol,2020

2. Transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) lead performance:A meta-analysis of observational studies;Providência;J Am Heart Assoc,2015

3. Inappropriate defibrillator shock due to oversensing. What is the mechanism?;Bera;Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J,2021

4. Preventing overdiagnosis of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead fractures using device diagnostics;Swerdlow;J Am Coll Cardiol,2011

5. 2017 HRS expert consensus statement on cardiovascular implantable electronic device lead management and extraction;Kusumoto;Heart Rhythm,2017