Evaluation of Colorimetric Nitrate Reductase Assay in Liquid Medium for Detection of Resistance to First-line Antitubercular Drugs

Author:

Aman Munaza1,Mir Anjum Ara1,Bashir Gulnaz1ORCID,Wani Sayim1,Khursheed Syed1,Ahangar Irfan Nisar1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Microbiology, Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Soura, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India

Abstract

Background: On a global scale, India holds the distinction of having the greatest number of tuberculosis (TB) cases caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) complex. The study aimed at evaluating the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, cost, rapidity, and feasibility of the performance of the colorimetric nitrate reductase-based antibiotic susceptibility (CONRAS) test against the indirect proportion method (IPM) on Lowenstein–Jensen media as the gold standard. Methods: A comparative cross-sectional study was performed on 51 MTB isolates. Fresh subcultures were used for drug susceptibility testing by IPM on the Lowenstein–Jensen medium and the CONRAS method in liquid medium. Quality control for drug susceptibility testing was done using a known sensitive strain of MTB (H37Rv) and strains resistant to both isoniazid (INH) and rifampicin (RIF) – multidrug-resistant (MDR), mono-resistant to RIF, streptomycin (STM), and ethambutol (EMB). Statistical analysis was performed using MedCalc software (Version 20.027). Results: CONRAS, carried out in microfuge tubes, was cost-efficient and easy to perform/interpret with most results being available in 10 days compared to 42 days in the case of IPM. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of RIF and INH were 100%, 97.37%, and 98.04 and 93.33%, 97.59%, and 96.08%, respectively, which translates into an almost perfect agreement between the two methods as indicated by κ value of 0.905 and 0.949, respectively, for the two drugs. The performance of CONRAS was less satisfactory for STM and EMB when compared to IPM. Conclusions: CONRAS may serve as a useful test for the detection of MDR-TB because of its accuracy, low cost, ease of performance/interpretation, and rapidity when compared to IPM on LJ medium. It does not involve the use of expensive reagents and equipment, as is the case with molecular methods like GeneXpert and line probe assay, making it a suitable option for the detection of MDR-TB in resource-poor settings.

Publisher

Medknow

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3