Comparison of Efficacy of Intubation with HugeMed Non-channelled Video Laryngoscope, McCoy and Macintosh Laryngoscope in Simulated Difficult Laryngoscopy Using Rigid Cervical Collar: A Prospective Randomized Trial

Abstract

Abstract Background and Aims: In cervical spine injuries, there is an impairment in positioning of the patient to maintain the airway axis during endotracheal intubation (ETI). Literature shows video laryngoscope (VLS) facilitating the intubation in these patients with cervical immobilization. VL3 VLS (HugeMed Medical Technical Development, Shenzhen, China) is a newer VLS with limited studies. The primary aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of ETI using VL3 VLS with Macintosh and McCoy (MC) blades for simulated difficult airway with rigid cervical collar (RCC). The secondary aim was to compare the oral insertion of laryngoscope and intraoral bleeding. Methods: One hundred and fifty patients were randomly divided into three groups depending on laryngoscope used for ETI. Group M, Group V, and Group MC used Macintosh, VL3, and MC laryngoscopic blades, respectively, for ETI. During ETI, the Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS), intubation time (IT), ease of laryngoscope insertion, and any bleeding intraorally were noted. The data collected were further analyzed. Results: IDS was statistically significantly least (0.9 ± 1.5) with VL3 VLS compared to direct laryngoscopy with Macintosh and MC blades. There was significantly no difference in IT among the three groups. Insertion of blade of VL3 was significantly more difficult than Macintosh or MC. Intraoral bleeding was present in 8% of patients with VL3. Conclusion: VL3 VLS can be used for ETI during cervical immobilization using RCC. More studies are needed to define its efficacy in different difficult airway situations compared with different VLS.