Efficacy of ultrasound-guided classical versus parasacral parallel shift technique of sacral plexus block for lower limb surgeries – A randomised controlled trial

Author:

Nair Revathi1ORCID,Samra Tanvir1ORCID,Ashok Vighnesh1ORCID,Jain Kajal1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India

Abstract

Background and Aims: Ultrasound-guided sacral plexus block has been used for anaesthesia and analgesia in lower limb surgeries. This study aimed to compare the block performance characteristics after ultrasound-guided (USG) sacral plexus nerve block (SNB) using the parasacral parallel shift (PSPS) approach versus the classical approach in patients undergoing orthopaedic below-knee limb surgeries. Methods: In this randomised study, 144 adult patients were randomised to receive USG SNB either by the classical approach (Group C) or the PSPS approach (Group P). A fixed dose of 20 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine was administered. Patients also received USG femoral nerve block with 10 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine. The primary outcome was the scanning time between the two groups. Secondary outcomes were the needling time, sensory and motor block onset and postoperative analgesic characteristics between the two groups. A P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The needling time and the scanning time were significantly lesser in Group P than in Group C (P < 0.05). Complete sensory and motor nerve blockade of the sciatic nerve was significantly higher in Group P (P = 0.029). Block performance time, time for sensory block and time for motor block were significantly less in Group P compared to Group C (P < 0.001). The postoperative analgesic characteristics were comparable between the two groups. Conclusion: The sacral plexus block with ultrasound-guided parasacral parallel shift technique had a lower block performance time with lesser needling and scanning time than the classical approach.

Publisher

Medknow

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3