Role of Mycobacterium indicus pranii in clinical outcomes in patients with sepsis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Author:

Saran Khushboo1ORCID,Iyengar Swathy S.2ORCID,Sinha Nitesh3ORCID,Abhishek Kumar4ORCID,Kumar Amit5ORCID,Prakash Jay6ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pathology, Gandhi Nagar Hospital, Central Coalfields Limited, Kanke, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India

2. Department of Neuroanaesthesia, People Tree Institute of Neurosciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

3. Department of Cardiac Anaesthesia, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India

4. Department of Trauma Critical Care, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India

5. Department of Laboratory Medicine, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India

6. Department of Critical Care Medicine, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India

Abstract

Background and Aims: Sepsis-induced immunosuppression appears to be reversible with immunomodulatory drugs. Mycobacterium indicus pranii (MIP) stimulates the Th1 type of immune response. This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) was aimed to find out if MIP is effective at improving clinical outcomes in sepsis patients. Methods: The databases (PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library), along with preprint servers until June 2023, were searched. The methodology was evaluated using the ‘Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias-2 tool’ for RCT. The study included patients more than 18 years of age with sepsis within 48 h of first organ dysfunction. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality, and secondary outcomes were the length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU), days on vasopressor support, ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), secondary infections, catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI), and the delta sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score. Results: The meta-analysis included two studies with 252 participants. In a pooled analysis, mortality in the MIP group was 43% lower than in the control (RR: 0.57, 95%CI: 0.33–1); however, this difference was statistically not significant. We observed the days on a vasopressor day (standardised mean difference [SMD]: 0.38; 95%CI: −1.20 to 0.44), length of ICU stay (SMD: 0.46; 95%CI: −1.44 to 0.51), secondary infection (RR: 0.75; 95%CI: 0.19–3.01), VAP (RR: 0.6; 95%CI: 0.28–1.56), CRBSI (RR: 0.97, 95%CI: 0.14–6.98), delta SOFA score (SMD: 0.88, 95%CI: −1.66 to − 0.10) between the two groups. Conclusions: Our findings observed preliminary evidence in the trends for a positive association of MIP with better outcomes in sepsis patients.

Publisher

Medknow

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3