Affiliation:
1. Director and Orthodontist, Smile Care, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
2. Associate Orthodontist, Smile Care, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
Abstract
Background
Various elements contributing to good functional occlusion have not been clearly assessed with cephalometrics for the diagnosis of functional problems and their application in clinical practice. The aim of this study, therefore, was to analyze different components of functional occlusion to formulate concise functional cephalometric analysis.
Materials and Methods
Eighty-two cases (38 males and 44 females), with class I occlusion and balanced facial profile, were examined based on the selection criteria, and cephalograms were taken in natural head position. All the radiographs were then analyzed using various functional parameters.
Results
The mean values of condylar path angle and incisal path angle were 55.83° and 65.67°, respectively, with large deviations. However, both showed positive correlation. The value of the angle of long axis of mandibular incisor with respect to the line joining center of condyle and lower incisor tip was 88.04°. Moreover, the angle between the occlusal plane and horizontal plane was 12.88°. In vertical plane, lower face height (LFH) was found to be slightly less than the upper face height. Maxilla contributed around 45% of the LFH while mandible formed about 60%. Furthermore, upper alveolar component (maxillary alveolar height) formed more than half of the maxilla (53.79%) whereas lower alveolar component (mandibular alveolar height) was 74.8% of the mandible.
Conclusion
This study has analyzed various components of functional occlusion and formulated a concise functional cephalometric analysis for diagnosis, treatment planning, and assessment of treatment results.
Reference24 articles.
1. Analysis of the dentofacial profile;Downs;Angle Orthod,1956
2. Cephalometrics for you and me;Steiner;Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,1953
3. The influence of orthodontic treatment on facial growth and development;Ricketts;Angle Orthod,1960
4. A method of cephalometric evaluation;McNamara;Am J Orthod,1984
5. Natural head position, posture, and prognathism: The chapman prize essay, 1986;Cole;Br J Orthod,1988