Comparative Outcomes and/or Complications Following Ventriculoperitoneal versus Lumboperitoneal Shunts: A Scoping Review

Author:

Maurya Ved Prakash1,Mishra Rakesh Kumar2,Sharma Pramod Kumar3,Cincu Rafael4,Moscote-Salazar Luis Rafael5,Agrawal Amit6

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurosurgery, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India

2. Department of Neurosurgery, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India

3. Department of Paediatric Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India

4. Department of Neurosurgery, General University Hospital, Valencia, Spain

5. Colombian Clinical Research Group in Neurocritical Care, Bogota, Colombia

6. Department of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India

Abstract

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion procedure in the form of ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) has been performed for over a century and is a well-established method for treating hydrocephalus. With the passage of time and the availability of better technology, several other CSF diversion modalities developed with variable risks and benefits. Lumboperitoneal shunt (LPS) is a close and safe contestant for the VP shunt procedure and is regarded as an alternative treatment modality for hydrocephalus. The present scoping review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. A literature search for the study was performed on PubMed, COCHRANE, SCOPUS and ScienceDirect (from inception to 7 July 2022). Those studies that were published in the English language with a report on comparison between VPS and LPS for the management of hydrocephalus were included in the review process. Those studies that do not have comparative outcomes, case reports, letters, reviews, preclinical studies, conference reports and non-human studies were excluded from the study. Search results showed 134 records; after removing the duplicates and excluding 12 studies with reasons, five studies were included in the present review. Several complications were described in patients who underwent either VP Shunt or LP Shunt surgery. Although communicating hydrocephalus forms one of the most significant subgroups of patients in neurosurgical practice and VP and LP shunt procedures are also widely performed, the literature review shows limited comparative efficacy. In addition, the reported studies have a broad spectrum of indications, disease conditions and complications with a heterogeneous patient population. To further develop the high level of evidence, there is a need for well-designed prospective protocols to help us develop uniform and practical guidelines. In the present review, we looked into the common complications, including shunt malfunction, shunt infection, subdural haematoma, shunt obstruction and shunt migration between two groups.

Publisher

Medknow

Subject

General Engineering

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3