A Comparative Evaluation of Apical Microleakage in Immediate vs Delayed Postspace Preparation using Four Endodontic Sealers seen under Stereomicroscope - An in vitro study

Author:

Megha Rani1,Neetu Jindal1,Renu Aggarwal1,Bharati Lisam1,Monika Choudhary1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Surendera College and Research Institute, Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan, India

Abstract

Context: An In-vitro research. Introduction: To evaluate the apical microleakage in immediate v/s delayed postspace preparation using four endodontic sealers; Endomethasone N, AH Plus, MTA Fillapex and Gutta Flow. Materials and Methods: One hundred and thirty recently excised single-rooted permanent teeth without caries were decorated. The postspace was created with a Peeso reamer from size 1–4, and 5 mm of gutta-percha was left after the root canals were biomechanically prepared up to F3 (ProTaper file) and obturated using the lateral condensation method. According to immediate and delayed postspace preparation, the samples were separated into eight groups, with 15 samples in each experimental group and 5 samples in each of the two control groups. Except for the apical 2 mm and the negative group, which were entirely sealed with two layers of sticky wax, all of the samples were covered with two layers of oppressive wax. Then, the samples were immersed in 2% methylene blue dye, centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 3 min, sectioned longitudinally and observed the extent of dye penetration under stereomicroscope. To compare the results between study groups and within each group, the Post hoc Tukey’s honestly significant difference comparison test and one-way ANOVA were utilized. When the P value was proved to be less than 0.05, the findings were deemed statistically significant. Results: Between all experimental groups, all samples revealed statistically significant differences. Group V (Endomethasone N-D) 3.46 ± 0.26 showed the greatest microleakage, whereas Group II (AH Plus I) 1.50 ± 0.40 showed little microleakage. Conclusions: Within the constraints of this study, postspace that was promptly prepared with all sealers experienced much-reduced microleakage.

Publisher

Medknow

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3