Comparison of the loss of resistance syringe to pilot balloon palpation in achieving the recommended endotracheal cuff pressure of Filipino patients in a tertiary private hospital: a cross-over randomized controlled trial

Author:

Cua-Lim Jacqueline T1,Lim William L1,Chua Antonio H1

Affiliation:

1. Department of ENT-HNS, St. Luke’s Medical Center, Taguig, Philippines

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objectives: This study compared the effectiveness of the loss of resistance (LOR) syringe and pilot balloon palpation (PBP) methods in delivering adequate air volume to the endotracheal cuff of Filipino patients during intubation under general anesthesia. Materials and Methods: This was a crossover randomized controlled study involving intubated patients conducted in St. Luke’s Medical Center from August to September 2022. There were 68 patients enrolled. Two methods to estimate the endotracheal cuff pressures were used for each patient—the LOR syringe LOR method and the PBP method. The patients were randomized into 1:1 ratio allocation to one of the two sequences—LOR–PBP sequence and PBP–LOR sequence. Endotracheal cuff air volume for each method was recorded and classified as adequate if within the air volume range that achieved 20–30 cmH2O based on the cuff manometer. Results: The median lower and upper range of adequate endotracheal cuff air volume were 7 and 8 mL, respectively. The median air volume was 7 mL (range: 6–9 mL) and 8 mL (range: 6–9 mL) when PBP and LOR syringe methods were used, respectively. The proportion of patients who received adequate air volume was significantly higher when the LOR syringe was used (97.06%, 66/68) compared to the PBP method (48.53%, 33/68) (P = 0.002). None of the participants reported adverse effects for both methods. Conclusions: The LOR syringe method was superior to the PBP method in delivering adequate endotracheal cuff air volume. This method is a viable option to ensure adequacy of endotracheal cuff air volume.

Publisher

Medknow

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3