Use of deep learning model for paediatric elbow radiograph binomial classification: initial experience, performance and lessons learnt

Author:

Tan Mark Bangwei1,Chua Russ Yuezhi2,Fan Qiao3,Fortier Marielle Valerie456,Chang Pearlly Peiqi7

Affiliation:

1. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore

2. Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore

3. Centre for Quantitative Medicine, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore

4. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Singapore

5. Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore

6. Institute for Clinical Sciences, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore

7. Department of Paediatrics, KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Singapore

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: In this study, we aimed to compare the performance of a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based deep learning model that was trained on a dataset of normal and abnormal paediatric elbow radiographs with that of paediatric emergency department (ED) physicians on a binomial classification task. Methods: A total of 1,314 paediatric elbow lateral radiographs (patient mean age 8.2 years) were retrospectively retrieved and classified based on annotation as normal or abnormal (with pathology). They were then randomly partitioned to a development set (993 images); first and second tuning (validation) sets (109 and 100 images, respectively); and a test set (112 images). An artificial intelligence (AI) model was trained on the development set using the EfficientNet B1 network architecture. Its performance on the test set was compared to that of five physicians (inter-rater agreement: fair). Performance of the AI model and the physician group was tested using McNemar test. Results: The accuracy of the AI model on the test set was 80.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 71.8%–87.3%), and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was 0.872 (95% CI 0.831–0.947). The performance of the AI model vs. the physician group on the test set was: sensitivity 79.0% (95% CI: 68.4%–89.5%) vs. 64.9% (95% CI: 52.5%–77.3%; P = 0.088); and specificity 81.8% (95% CI: 71.6%–92.0%) vs. 87.3% (95% CI: 78.5%–96.1%; P = 0.439). Conclusion: The AI model showed good AUROC values and higher sensitivity, with the P-value at nominal significance when compared to the clinician group.

Publisher

Medknow

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3