Patient Satisfaction and Acceptance of Their Totally Implanted Central Venous Catheter: A French Prospective Multicenter Study

Author:

Marcy Pierre-Yves1,Schiappa Renaud2,Ferrero Jean-Marc3,Dahlet Christian4,Brenet Olivier5,Yazbec Gabriel6,Dubois Pierre-Yves6,Salm Bernard7,Fouche Yves8,Mari Veronique8,Montastruc Marion9,Lebrec Nathalie5,Ancel Benoit7,Paillocher Nicolas5,Dupoiron Denis5,Rangeard Olivier7,Gal Jocelyn2,Ettaiche Marc2,Chateau Yann2,Chamorey Emmanuel2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Radiology, PolyClinique Les Fleurs, Ollioules - France

2. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice - France

3. Department of Clinical Research, Innovation and Statistics, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice - France

4. Department of Radiology, Centre Paul-Strauss, Strasbourg - France

5. Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Paul-Papin, ICO, Angers - France

6. Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Jean Godinot, Reims - France

7. Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Alexis-Vautrin, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy - France

8. Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice - France

9. Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Claudius-Rigaud, Toulouse - France

Abstract

Introduction Most cancer patients require a totally implanted central venous catheter (TIVAD) for their treatment. In a previous study, we developed and validated a questionnaire dubbed QASICC (Questionnaire for Acceptance of, and Satisfaction with, Implanted Central Venous Catheter) assessing patient satisfaction with, and acceptance of, their TIVAD. In the present study, we conducted a large, prospective, multicenter study in cancer patients aimed to analyze factors that could influence patients’ acceptance of, and satisfaction with, their device. Methods The QASICC is composed of 22 items assessing 5 dimensions. The construction and validation of the questionnaire was achieved using validated methodology to determine its psychometric characteristics. The questionnaire was submitted to 720 patients in 11 French institutions; 567 answers were analyzed. Results Younger patients had the most difficulties in coping with their TIVAD, especially regarding daily activities and their body image and private life compared to older patients. Sex was significantly related to patient satisfaction, with worse scores in women. Breast tumor location was also correlated with low TIVAD acceptance. TIVAD on the right side also positively influenced satisfaction and acceptance of the device. Conclusions QASICC has proved to be efficient, and to detect known issues regarding daily activities and body image. As our population was mostly composed of women with breast cancer, our results reflect specific aspects of this population. The TIVAD remains generally well-accepted and our questionnaire should help health-care workers to better address the specific needs of their patients based on the answers provided.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Nephrology,Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3