Gavecelt Consensus Statement on the Correct use of Totally Implantable Venous Access Devices for Diagnostic Radiology Procedures

Author:

Bonciarelli Giorgio1,Batacchi Stefano2,Biffi Roberto3,Buononato Massimo4,Damascelli Bruno5,Ghibaudo Flavio6,Orsi Franco7,Pittiruti Mauro8,Scoppettuolo Giancarlo9,Verzè Alessia10,Borasi Guido11,De Cicco Marcello12,Dosio Roberto13,Gazzo Paolo14,Maso Renzo15,Roman Alessandro16,Ticha Vladimira17,Venier Giacomo18,Blackburn Paul19,Goossens Godelieve A.20,Santolucito Jamie Bowen21,Stas Marguerite20,Van Boxtel Ton22,Vesely Thomas M.23,de Lutio Enrico24

Affiliation:

1. Medical Oncology Unit, Azienda ULSS 17, Este, Monselice - Italy

2. Anaesthesiology and Emergency Department DAI DEA and Medical and Surgical Emergencies, University Hospital of Careggi, Florence - Italy

3. Division of Abdomino-Pelvic Surgery, European Institute of Oncology, Milan - Italy

4. Department of General Surgery, Azienda Istituti Ospitalieri, Cremona - Italy

5. Department of Interventional Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliera Bolognini, Seriate - Italy

6. Private nurse, Cuneo - Italy

7. Interventional Radiology Unit, European Institute of Oncology, Milan - Italy

8. Department of Surgery, Catholic University, Rome - Italy

9. Infective Disease Department, Sacro Cuore Catholic University, Rome - Italy

10. Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Borgo Trento, Verona - Italy

11. CPSI DEA and MSA Maggiore Hospital, Chieri - Italy

12. Department of Clinical-Specialty Services and Support, IRCCS Aviano - Italy

13. Radiology Service, Evangelico Valdese Hospital, Torino - Italy

14. Department of Angiography and Interventional Radiology, “Santa Corona ” Hospital, Pietra Ligure - Italy

15. Radiology Unit Conegliano, Ospedale Civile Ulss 7, Pieve di Soligo - Italy

16. Radiology Service, Oftalmico Hospital, Torino - Italy

17. Radiology Service, San Carlo Borromeo Hospital, Milan - Italy

18. UOS of Pain Therapy and Palliative Care, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Ospedale di Conegliano (TV) UlSS7, Regione Veneto - Italy

19. Clinical Programs, Bard Access Systems, Salt lake City, Utah - USA

20. UZ Leuven, Leuven - Belgium

21. Oregon Health & Science University Hospital, Portland, Oregon - USA

22. Home Infusion Team, Utrecht - The Netherlands

23. Vascular Access Services, LLC, Saint Louis, Missouri - USA

24. MD Consultant, Rome - Italy

Abstract

The use of totally implantable venous access devices in radiology may be associated with complications such as occlusion of the system (because of the high density of some contrast), infection (if the port is not handled in aseptic conditions, using proper barrier protections), and mechanical complications due to the high-pressure administration of contrast by automatic injectors (so-called power injector), including extravasation of contrast media into the soft tissues, subintimal venous or myocardial injection, or serious damage to the device itself (breakage of the external connections, dislocation of the non-coring needle, or breakage of the catheter). The last problem – i.e., the damage of the device from a power injection – is not an unjustified fear, but a reality. A warning by the US Food and Drug Administration of July 2004 reports around 250 complications of this kind, referring to both port and central venous catheters and peripherally inserted central catheter systems, which occurred over a period of several years; in all cases, the damage occurred during the injection of contrast material by means of power injectors for computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging procedures. Though the risk associated with the use of ports in radiodiagnostics is thus clear, it has been suggested that administration of the contrast material via the port may have some advantage in terms of image quality, increased comfort for the patient, and maybe more accurate reproducibility of the patient's own follow-up exams. This contention needs to be supported by evidence. Also, since many cancer patients who need frequent computed tomography studies already have totally implantable systems, it would seem reasonable to try to define how and when such systems may safely be used. The purpose of this consensus statement is to define recommendations based on the best available evidence, for the safe use of implantable ports in radiodiagnostics.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Nephrology,Surgery

Reference38 articles.

Cited by 16 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3