Comment on Gignac and Zajenkowski, “The Dunning-Kruger effect is (mostly) a statistical artefact: Valid approaches to testing the hypothesis with individual differences data”-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Comment on Gignac and Zajenkowski, “The Dunning-Kruger effect is (mostly) a statistical artefact: Valid approaches to testing the hypothesis with individual differences data”

Published:2023-03 Issue: Volume:97 Page:101732
ISSN:0160-2896
Container-title:Intelligence
language:en
Short-container-title:Intelligence

Author:

Hiller Avram

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Developmental and Educational Psychology,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Reference19 articles.

1. Skilled or unskilled, but still unaware of it: How perceptions of difficulty drive miscalibration in relative comparisons;Burson;Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2006

2. Reevaluating the Dunning-Kruger effect: A response to and replication of Gignac and Zajenkowski (2020);Dunkel;Intelligence,2023

3. Why the unskilled are unaware: Further explorations of (absent) self-insight among the incompetent;Ehrlinger;Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,2008

4. Estimating the relationship between skill and overconfidence;Feld;Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics,2017

5. The association between objective and subjective financial literacy: Failure to observe the Dunning-Kruger effect;Gignac;Personality and Individual Differences,2022

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. No strong support for a Dunning–Kruger effect in creativity: analyses of self-assessment in absolute and relative terms;Scientific Reports;2024-05-24

2. Ego vs. reality: Narcissism and the discrepancy between academic expectations and achievement;Learning and Individual Differences;2024-05

3. Still no Dunning-Kruger effect: A reply to Hiller;Intelligence;2023-03