The Grade Debate: Evidence, Knowledge Gaps, and Perspectives on Clerkship Assessment Across the UME to GME Continuum-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

The Grade Debate: Evidence, Knowledge Gaps, and Perspectives on Clerkship Assessment Across the UME to GME Continuum

Published:2023-04 Issue:4 Volume:136 Page:394-398
ISSN:0002-9343
Container-title:The American Journal of Medicine
language:en
Short-container-title:The American Journal of Medicine

Author:

Schafer Katherine R.^ORCID,Sood Lonika,King Christopher J.,Alexandraki Irene,Aronowitz Paul,Cohen Margot,Chretien Katherine,Pahwa Amit,Shen E,Williams Donna,Hauer Karen E.

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

General Medicine

Reference43 articles.

1. Racial/ethnic disparities in clinical grading in medical school;Low;Teach Learn Med,2019

2. Association of American Medical Colleges. Grading systems used in medical school programs. Available athttps://www.aamc.org/data-reports/curriculum-reports/interactive-data/grading-systems-used-medical-school-programs. Accessed October 20, 2022, 2022.

3. “There is a lot of change afoot”: a qualitative study of faculty adaptation to elimination of tiered grades with increased emphasis on feedback in core clerkships;McDonald;Acad Med,2021

4. In pursuit of honors: a multi-institutional study of students' perceptions of clerkship evaluation and grading;Bullock;Acad Med,2019

5. Determining grades in the internal medicine clerkship: results of a national survey of clerkship directors;Hernandez;Acad Med,2021

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A Comparison of 100-Point Numeric Grading System and Letter-Based Grading System in Medical Clerkship Assessment: A Single-Centre Study;2023-12-29