Determining minimal clinically important difference estimates following surgery for degenerative conditions of the lumbar spine: analysis of the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN) registry-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Determining minimal clinically important difference estimates following surgery for degenerative conditions of the lumbar spine: analysis of the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN) registry

Published:2023-09 Issue:9 Volume:23 Page:1323-1333
ISSN:1529-9430
Container-title:The Spine Journal
language:en
Short-container-title:The Spine Journal

Author:

Power J. Denise,Perruccio Anthony V.^ORCID,Canizares Mayilee,McIntosh Greg^ORCID,Abraham Edward,Attabib Najmedden,Bailey Christopher S.,Charest-Morin Raphaële,Dea Nicholas^ORCID,Finkelstein Joel^ORCID,Fisher Charles^ORCID,Glennie R. Andrew^ORCID,Hall Hamilton^ORCID,Johnson Michael G.,Kelly Adrienne M.^ORCID,Kingwell Stephen^ORCID,Manson Neil,Nataraj Andrew,Paquet Jérôme^ORCID,Singh Supriya,Soroceanu Alex,Thomas Kenneth C,Weber Michael H.,Rampersaud Y. Raja

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Surgery,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Reference42 articles.

1. Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: A review of concepts and methods;Copay;Spine J,2007

2. Fulfillment of patient expectations after spine surgery is critical to patient satisfaction: A cohort study of spine surgery patients;Rampersaud;Neurosurgery,2022

3. Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference;Jaeschke;Control Clin Trials,1989

4. Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: A choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales;Copay;Spine J,2008

5. Determination of minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after extension of fusion for adjacent-segment disease;Parker;J Neurosurg Spine,2012

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Histopathologic degenerative score as a predictor of minimal clinically important difference in pain and functionality following surgical treatment for disc herniation;Biomolecules and Biomedicine;2024-07-20

2. Reassessing the minimum 2-year follow-up standard after lumbar decompression surgery: a 2-month follow-up seems to be an acceptable minimum;The Spine Journal;2024-07

3. Calculation of the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) using different methodologies: case study and practical guide;European Spine Journal;2024-06-28

4. The influence of preoperative Veterans RAND-12 physical composite score in patients undergoing anterior lumbar interbody fusion [Retrospective Review];Journal of Clinical Neuroscience;2024-05

5. Perspective on Intradiscal Therapies for Lumbar Discogenic Pain: State of the Science, Knowledge Gaps, and Imperatives for Clinical Adoption;Journal of Pain Research;2024-03