Narratives of life with long-term low back pain: A follow up interview study

Author:

Angel Sanne1,Jensen Lone Donbæk2,Maribo Thomas34,Gonge Birgitte Krøis5,Buus Niels6

Affiliation:

1. Section for Nursing , Institute of Public Health, Aarhus University , Hoegh-Guldbergs Gade 6 A, 8000 Aarhus C , Denmark

2. Danish Ramazzini Center, Department of Occupational Medicine , Aarhus University Hospital , Aarhus , Denmark

3. Rehabilitation Center Marselisborg, Department of Public Health , Section of Social Medicine and Rehabilitation, Aarhus University , Aarhus , Denmark

4. Public Health and Quality Improvement , Central Denmark Region , Aarhus , Denmark

5. Brückner Praksis , Søndergade 53, 3, 8000 Åarhus C , Denmark

6. The Centre for Family-Based Mental Health Care, Sydney Nursing School at St. Vincent’s Hospital/St. Vincent’s Private Hospital Sydney , The University Sydney , Sydney , Australia

Abstract

Abstract Background Long-term low back pain is associated with multiple challenges to a person’s identity and social position. Despite efforts to understand the challenges of low back pain, recovery remains a major problem both personally and socially. This indicate a need for a different approach. Although personal stories have been used to extend knowledge of issues that relate to low back pain, they also make i possible to learn about how people understand themselves and their lives. As such, analysis of narrative: may provide further insights into people’s coping processes and novel insights about how best to support them. Objective The aim of the study was to analyse personal recovery narratives to gain an insight into how people understand themselves and cope with long-term low back pain 2-4 years after a bio-psycho-social counselling intervention. Study design Using a Ricoeurian phenomenological-hermeneutic perspective, qualitative in-depth interviews were undertaken and interpreted to explore people’s narratives of long-term recovery after an intervention. Methods We interviewed 25 informants 2-4 years after participating in a counselling intervention for low back pain where they were advised to exercise regularly; they were part of the intervention group in a randomised clinical trial. The sample included both informants who had benefited from the intervention and some who had not. Analysis was informed by Ricoeur’s interpretation theory. Findings The informants’ stories revealed two main narratives regarding themselves and their lives: (1) getting on with life without pain, (2) life with continual pain and variations of the emplotment. The first included Recovering from low back pain and returning to prior lifestyle if possible, Keeping low back pain in check by strict regimes, or Developing strategies when low back pain recurs. The second related to Finding a way to a functioning everyday life with continual pain while narratives of being stuck with low back pain and finding no way out highlight the significance of being able to configure a narrative that can support an understanding of the pain and how to deal with it to have a functioning life. Furthermore, the health professional has a significant role to play in the configuration of narratives. Conclusions The challenge for people with low back pain was to find ways of getting on with life, and this included their ability to configure an understandable narrative that opened up for a future, implying new understandings of the self and how life could be lived. When healthcare professionals offered personal and realistic suggestions to the informants’ configuration of narratives of life with low back pain, they supported a positive change in the informants’ ways of coping with their situation. Implications Health professionals can play an important role in low back pain sufferers’ configuration of meaningful narratives that help in coping with pain and learning about the relationship between pain and everyday life.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,Neurology (clinical)

Reference29 articles.

1. Snelgrove S, Liossi C. Living with chronic low back pain: a metasynthesis of qualitative research. Chronic Illn 2013;9:283–301.

2. Aymar M. A phenomenological approach to understanding the psychological response to chronic low back pain. Dissertation. St. Catharines, ON: Faculty of Applied Health Sciences, Brock University; 2010.

3. Blair MB. Quality of life despite back pain: a phenomenological study. Dissertation. Lincoln, NE: The Graduate College at the University of Nebraska; 2010.

4. Thomas P, Polio HR. Now it’s me and this pain: living with chronic pain I: listeningto patients. NY: Springer Publisher Company; 2002. p. 73-93.

5. Froud R, Patterson S, Eldridge S, Seale C, Pincus T, Rajendran D, Fossum C, Underwood M. Asystematic review and meta-synthesis of the impact of low back pain on people’s lives. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2014;15:1–15.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3