Systematic reviews to evaluate diagnostic tests-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Systematic reviews to evaluate diagnostic tests

Published:2001-03 Issue:1 Volume:95 Page:6-11
ISSN:0301-2115
Container-title:European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
language:en
Short-container-title:European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

Author:

Khan Khalid S.,Dinnes Jacqueline,Kleijnen Jos

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynaecology,Reproductive Medicine

Reference49 articles.

1. Guidelines for meta-analyses evaluation diagnostic tests;Irwig;Ann. Intern. Med.,1994

2. Cochrane Methods Working Group on Systematic Reviews of Screening and Diagnostic Tests: Recommended Methods, updated 6th June, 1996. [Available at http:// http://hiru.mcmaster.ca/cochrane/cochrane/Sadtdoc1.htm].

3. For the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Users’ guides to the medical literature: XVII. How to use guidelines and recommendations about screening;Barratt;JAMA,1999

4. The assessment of diagnostic tests: a survey of current medical research;Sheps;JAMA,1984

5. Use of methodological standards in diagnostic test research. Getting better but still not good;Reid;JAMA,1995

Cited by 78 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Revisiones sistemáticas en cinco pasos: I. Cómo formular una pregunta para la que se pueda obtener una respuesta válida;Medicina de Familia. SEMERGEN;2022-07

2. lilacs search strategy for systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy studies;Health Information & Libraries Journal;2019-07-04

3. Determining qualitative effect size ratings using a likelihood ratio scatter matrix in diagnostic test accuracy systematic reviews;Diagnosis;2018-09-22

4. The predictive value of bedside ultrasound to restore spontaneous circulation in patients with pulseless electrical activity: A systematic review and meta-analysis;PLOS ONE;2018-01-24

5. Improving medication adherence among community-dwelling seniors with cognitive impairment: a systematic review of interventions;International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy;2017-05-29