1. Examples of this diverse array of opinion on the future direction of the Depository Library Program include: U.S. Government Printing Office, Study to Identify Measures Necessary for a Successful Transition to a More Electronic Federal Depository Library Program as Required by Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 1996 Public Law 104-53 (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1996); U.S. Congress, House of Representatives, Legislative Branch Appropriations Bill 1997, 104th Cong., 2nd sess., 1996, House Report 104-657, 27–28; Bruce W. McConnell, “New Wine in Old Wineskins: U.S. Government Information in a Networked World,” Journal of Government Information 23, no. 3 (May/June 1996): 217–226; Bernadine E. Abbott-Hoduski, “Democracy in America is Best Served by a Multiformat Federal Depository Library Program,” Journal of Government Information 23, no. 3 (May/June 1996): 241–252; Duncan M. Aldrich, “Depository Libraries, the Internet, and the 21st Century?,” Journal of Government Information 23, no. 3 (May/June 1996): 381–392; and Peter Hernon, “The Electronic Federal Depository Library Program,” Government Information Quarterly 13 (1996): 341–343.
2. Frederick Jackson Turner, History, Frontier and Section: Three Essays by Frederick Jackson Turner, with an introduction by Martin Ridge (Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press, 1993), 10–11.
3. Frederick Jackson Turner, “The Significance of the Frontier in American History,” in History, Frontier and Section: Three Essays by Frederick Jackson Turner, 59, 88.
4. U.S. Bureau of the Census, Historical Statistics of the United States: Colonial Times to 1970 (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1975), 1:386.
5. Lewis L. Gould, The Presidency of Theodore Roosevelt (Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas, 1991), 30.