Conceptual Debates and Empirical Evidence About the Peer Review Process for Scholarly Journals-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Conceptual Debates and Empirical Evidence About the Peer Review Process for Scholarly Journals

Published:2011-05 Issue:3 Volume:27 Page:168-173
ISSN:8755-7223
Container-title:Journal of Professional Nursing
language:en
Short-container-title:Journal of Professional Nursing

Author:

Thomas Sandra P.

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

General Nursing

Reference44 articles.

1. Blinding in peer review: The preferences of reviewers for nursing journals;Baggs;Journal of Advanced Nursing,2008

2. The manuscript review process: The proper roles of authors, referees, and editors;Bedeian;Journal of Management Inquiry,2003

3. Peer review and the social construction of knowledge in the management discipline;Bedeian;Academy of Management Learning and Education,2004

4. Peer review;Biagioli,2003

5. Broome, M., Dougherty, M., Baggs, J., Kearney, M.H., & Freda, M.C. (2009). Ethical concerns of nursing journal reviewers: An international survey. Presented at the Sixth International Congress on Peer Review and Biomedical Publication. Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Cited by 14 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The Peer Reviewer: An Endangered Species?;Issues in Mental Health Nursing;2023-05-04

2. Feedback practices in journal peer-review: a systematic literature review;Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education;2023-01-12

3. Buenas prácticas en la organización, gestión y dirección de los centros educativos;Bordón. Revista de Pedagogía;2020-03-09

4. An incredible hoax that damages legitimate scholarship regarding social justice issues;Issues in Mental Health Nursing;2018-11-02

5. Current Controversies Regarding Peer Review in Scholarly Journals;Issues in Mental Health Nursing;2018-02