Affiliation:
1. From the lnstitut de la Main, Institut Français de Chirurgie de la Main and Unité de Biostatistique d’Informatique Médicale, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Paris, France
Abstract
The authors compare in a prospective, randomized study the early outcome of carpal tunnel release using either a conventional palmar open release ( n=40) or a two-portal endoscopic release ( n=56). Both groups were similar. No statistically significant differences were found regarding pain, disappearing of paraesthesiae or time to return to work. However, better recovery of grip strength was observed in the endoscopic group at 1 and 3 months. No surgical complications were observed in either group.
Cited by
60 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献