Italian Version of the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (dash) Questionnaire. Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Italian Version of the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (dash) Questionnaire. Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation

Published:2003-04 Issue:2 Volume:28 Page:179-186
ISSN:0266-7681
Container-title:Journal of Hand Surgery
language:en
Short-container-title:Journal of Hand Surgery

Author:

PADUA R.¹,PADUA L.¹,CECCARELLI E.¹,ROMANINI E.¹,ZANOLI G.¹,AMADIO P.C.¹,CAMPI A.¹

Affiliation:

1. From the Orthopedics Department, San Giacomo Hospital, Rome, Italy; GLOBE, Evidence based orthopedics working group of Italian Society of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Italy; Institute of Neurology, Institute of Orthopedics, Catholic University, Rome, Italy; IsPeO—Institue of Orthopedics Specialty, Rome, Italy; Institute of Orthopedics, University of Ferrara, Italy and Division of Hand Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA

Abstract

An Italian version of the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire has been devised and its reliability and validity have been assessed in a cross-sectional study of 108 consecutive patients with upper extremity pathologies. A sub-sample of 30 patients was used to assess re-test reliability. The principal DASH scale showed a high correlation with other patient-oriented measures and demonstrated good reproducibility, consistency and validity, which were similar to those for other languages’ versions of DASH. These findings suggest that the evaluation capacities of the Italian DASH are equivalent to those of other language versions of the DASH.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Transplantation,Surgery

Link

http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1016/S0266-7681%2802%2900303-0

Reference21 articles.

1. Outcomes measurements.

2. The Italian SF-36 Health Survey

3. The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire: Reliability and validity of the Swedish version evaluated in 176 patients

4. Measuring Function of the Shoulder. A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Five Questionnaires*

5. Measuring disability of the upper extremity: A rationale supporting the use of a regional outcome measure

Cited by 167 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Ultrasoundhydrodistention in adhesivecapsulitis: Hospital versus home-based rehabilitation;The Egyptian Rheumatologist;2024-10

2. Is the critical shoulder angle a risk factor for symptomatic cuff tear after proximal humerus fracture treated with antegrade intramedullary bent nail?;Minerva Orthopedics;2024-08

3. Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Italian version of the Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) in subjects with shoulder pain;Disability and Rehabilitation;2024-05-03

4. From Diagnosis to Decision-Making: A Systematic Review of the Management of Reverse Hill-Sachs Lesions after Posterior Shoulder Dislocations;Journal of Clinical Medicine;2024-04-03

5. Psychometric properties of the Disability of Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH) in subjects with frozen shoulder: a reliability and validity study;BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders;2024-04-02