1. What Roe v. Wade Should Have Said;Balkin,2005
2. Ball, N.T., 1999. The reemergence of enlightenment ideas in the 1994 French bioethics debates. Duke Law J. 50, 545–587. http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/dlj/vol50/iss2/4/.
3. Bragdon v. Abbott, 1998. 524 U.S. 624, wherein the Court argued that procreation was a major life activity and as such was protected by the Americans With Disabilities Act: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/524/624/ (accessed September 18th 2019).
4. Buck v. Bell, 1927. ‘Three generations of imbeciles are enough’ 274 U.S. 200 https://www.oyez.org/cases/1900-1940/274us200.
5. Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, 2014. 573 U.S. 682. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/573/13-354/#tab-opinion-1970980.