Comparison of the behaviour of two core designs for ASTRID in case of severe accidents-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Comparison of the behaviour of two core designs for ASTRID in case of severe accidents

Published:2016-02 Issue: Volume:297 Page:327-342
ISSN:0029-5493
Container-title:Nuclear Engineering and Design
language:en
Short-container-title:Nuclear Engineering and Design

Author:

Bertrand F.,Marie N.,Prulhière G.,Lecerf J.,Seiler J.M.

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

Mechanical Engineering,Waste Management and Disposal,Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality,General Materials Science,Nuclear Energy and Engineering,Nuclear and High Energy Physics

Reference17 articles.

1. Primary containment capacity of Prototype Fast Breeder Reactor against core disruptive accident loadings;Chellapandi;Nucl. Eng. Des.,2013

2. Status of ASTRID core design studies at the end of predesign phase 1″;Chenaud;Nucl. Eng. Technol.,2013

3. Non Site Specific Safety Report;EFR,1999

4. CATHARE 2 V2.5_2: a single version for various applications;Geffraye;Nucl. Eng. Des.,2011

5. A Technology Roadmap for Generation IV Nuclear Energy Systems;GIF,2002

Cited by 28 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Corium pool behaviour in the core catcher of a sodium-cooled fast reactor;Nuclear Engineering and Design;2023-10

2. Studies and cross-comparisons of severe accident prevention and mitigation capabilities of a SFR and a GFR;Nuclear Engineering and Design;2022-08

3. Chemical interaction between uranium dioxide, boron carbide and stainless steel at 1900 °C — Application to a severe accident scenario in sodium cooled fast reactors;Journal of Nuclear Materials;2021-12

4. Mitigation of severe accidents for SFR and associated event sequence assessment;Nuclear Engineering and Design;2021-02

5. 2D and 3D numerical investigations of sodium boiling in sodium cooled fast reactor with MOX fuel and low sodium void reactivity effect during unprotected loss of flow accidents;Nuclear Engineering and Design;2021-02