Radical Perineal Prostatectomy without Pelvic Lymphadenectomy: Selection Criteria and Early Results-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Radical Perineal Prostatectomy without Pelvic Lymphadenectomy: Selection Criteria and Early Results

Published:1996-02 Issue:2 Volume:155 Page:612-615
ISSN:0022-5347
Container-title:Journal of Urology
language:en
Short-container-title:Journal of Urology

Author:

Parra Raul O.¹,Isorna Santiago¹,Garcia Perez Marceliano¹,Cummings James M.¹,Boullier John A.¹

Affiliation:

1. Division of Urology, St. Louis University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, and Departments of Urology, University of Las Palmas, Canary Islands and Hospital Universitario Ntra. Sra. De Valme, Sevilla, Spain.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Urology

Reference31 articles.

1. Prognostic significance of lymph nodal metastases in prostate cancer;Gervasi;J. Urol.,1989

2. Prognosis of patients with stage D1 prostatic adenocarcinoma;Kramer;J. Urol.,1981

3. The value of computerized tomography in evaluation of pelvic lymph nodes;Benson;J. Urol.,1981

4. Accuracy of CT in detecting intra-abdominal and pelvic lymph node metastases from pelvic cancers;Lee;AJR,1978

5. Detecting lymphatic metastases from prostatic carcinoma: superiority of CT;Levine;AJR,1981

Cited by 36 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. EVALUATION OF COMPLICATIONS OF RADICAL PERINEAL PROSTATECTOMY: EXPERIENCE OF 200 CASES;The Japanese Journal of Urology;2015

2. Experience with radical perineal prostatectomy in the treatment of localized prostate cancer;Therapeutic Advances in Urology;2012-03-22

3. Radical Retropubic and Perineal Prostatectomy;Campbell-Walsh Urology;2012

4. Comparative analysis of radical prostatectomy techniques using perineal or suprapubic approach in the treatment of localized prostate cancer;Einstein (São Paulo);2010-06

5. Guideline for optimization of surgical and pathological quality performance for radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer management:evidentiary base;Canadian Urological Association Journal;2010-02-01