1. Colomina, B., Esther, C., Ignacio Gonzalez, G., Anna-Maria, M. (2012). Radical Pedagogies, The Architectural Review, V.232, No. 1388, pp: 78-82 London UK: Emap Limited.
2. Gallagher, S. (1992). Hermeneutics and Education, Albany: State University of New York Press. As cited in Philippou, S., (2001). On a Paradox in Design Studio Teaching or The Centrality of the Periphery, Architectural Education Exchange 2001 Architectural Educators: Responding to Change, Cardiff University, LTSN Center for Education in the Built Environment, 11-12 September.
3. Goldschmidt, G., Hochman, H., & Dafni, I. (2010). The design studio “crit”: Teacher–student communication, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 24, 285-302.
4. Koolhaas, R. (1991). ‘Seminar 1/21/91’ in R.Koolhaas 1996, Conversations with Students, ed. S.Kwinter, Houston, Texas: Rice University School of Architecture and New York: Princeton Architectural Press, pp. 37-65. As cited in Philippou, S. (2001). On a Paradox in Design Studio Teaching or The Centrality of the Periphery, Architectural Education Exchange 2001 Architectural Educators: Responding to Change, Cardiff University, LTSN Center for Education in the Built Environment, 11-12 September.
5. Quayle, M. (1985). Ideabook for Teaching Design, Mesa, AZ: PDA Publisher Corporation. As cited in Goldschmidt, G., Hochman, H., & Dafni, I. (2010). The design studio “crit”: Teacher–student communication, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 24, 285-302.